Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20080604›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Effect of hydrogen bond cooperativity on the behavior of water.

Kevin Stokely, Marco G Mazza, H Eugene Stanley, Giancarlo Franzese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Order in Liquid, Supercooled, and Crystalline Water.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structural changes across thermodynamic maxima in supercooled liquid tellurium: A water-like scenario.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in the study of supercooled water.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Specific Heat and Transport Functions ofWater.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Proton Density of States in Confined Water (HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Water-like anomalies as a function of tetrahedrality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  20. Supercooled and glassy water: Metastable liquid(s), amorphous solid(s), and a no-man's land.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin StokelyCenter for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. stokely@bu.edu
Marco G Mazza
H Eugene Stanley
Giancarlo Franzese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four scenarios have been proposed for the low-temperature phase behavior of liquid water, each predicting different thermodynamics. The physical mechanism that leads to each is debated. Moreover, it is still unclear which of the scenarios best describes water, because there is no definitive experimental test. Here we address both open issues within the framework of a microscopic cell model by performing a study combining mean-field calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. We show that a common physical mechanism underlies each of the four scenarios, and that two key physical quantities determine which of the four scenarios describes water: (i) the strength of the directional component of the hydrogen bond and (ii) the strength of the cooperative component of the hydrogen bond. The four scenarios may be mapped in the space of these two quantities. We argue that our conclusions are model independent. Using estimates from experimental data for H-bond properties the model predicts that the low-temperature phase diagram of water exhibits a liquid-liquid critical point at positive pressure.

Identifiers

PMID20080604
PMCPMC2824356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.