Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20080586›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Optimized detection of sequence variation in heterozygous genomes using DNA microarrays with isothermal-melting probes.

David Gresham, Bo Curry, Alexandra Ward, D Benjamin Gordon, Leonardo Brizuela, Leonid Kruglyak, David Botstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Strengths and weaknesses of microarray approaches to detect Pseudo-nitzschia species in the field.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2013
    Article
  14. Reciprocal uniparental disomy in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David GreshamDepartment of Molecular Biology and Lewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Bo Curry
Alexandra Ward
D Benjamin Gordon
Leonardo Brizuela
Leonid Kruglyak
David Botstein

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
Genetics of Functional Interactions in YeastR01GM046406 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOTSTEIN, DAVID · 2001 to 2015
$9.5M
Regulation of Quiescence in Eukaryotic CellsR01GM107466 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GRESHAM, DAVID · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
GENETICS OF FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONS IN YEASTR37GM046406 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOTSTEIN, DAVID · 1991 to 2000
$683k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM046406NIGMS NIH HHS GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046406NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107466NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of DNA microarrays to identify nucleotide variation is almost 20 years old. A variety of improvements in probe design and experimental conditions have brought this technology to the point that single-nucleotide differences can be efficiently detected in unmixed samples, although developing reliable methods for detection of mixed sequences (e.g., heterozygotes) remains challenging. Surprisingly, a comprehensive study of the probe design parameters and experimental conditions that optimize discrimination of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has yet to be reported, so the limits of this technology remain uncertain. By targeting 24,549 SNPs that differ between two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, we studied the effect of SNPs on hybridization efficiency to DNA microarray probes of different lengths under different hybridization conditions. We found that the critical parameter for optimization of sequence discrimination is the relationship between probe melting temperature (T(m)) and the temperature at which the hybridization reaction is performed. This relationship can be exploited through the design of microarrays containing probes of equal T(m) by varying the length of probes. We demonstrate using such a microarray that we detect >90% homozygous SNPs and >80% heterozygous SNPs using the SNPScanner algorithm. The optimized design and experimental parameters determined in this study should guide DNA microarray designs for applications that require sequence discrimination such as mutation detection, genotyping of unmixed and mixed samples, and allele-specific gene expression. Moreover, designing microarray probes with optimized sensitivity to mismatches should increase the accuracy of standard microarray applications such as copy-number variation detection and gene expression analysis.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsDNA ProbesNucleic Acid DenaturationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNADNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID20080586
PMCPMC2824413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.