Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20080128›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2010

Sensory and sensorimotor gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine in Sprague Dawley and Long Evans rats.

Michelle R Breier, Brittanni Lewis, Jody M Shoemaker, Gregory A Light, Neal R Swerdlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle R BreierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093-0804, USA.
Brittanni Lewis
Jody M Shoemaker
Gregory A Light
Neal R Swerdlow
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

SENSORY GATING &HABITUATION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH042228 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BRAFF, DAVID L. · 1987 to 2015
$6.5M
Neural Basis of Heritable DA-Mediated Gating DeficitsR01MH068366 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SWERDLOW, NEAL R · 2003 to 2010
$1.6M
SENSORY GATING AND HABITUATION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR37MH042228 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI BRAFF, DAVID L. · 1993 to 2002
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS MH42228NIMH NIH HHS MH68366NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH042228NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068366NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH042228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleRat strains differ in sensitivity to the disruptive effects of dopamine agonists on sensorimotor gating, measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle. For example, Sprague Dawley (SD) rats are more sensitive to PPI-disruptive effects of apomorphine (APO) compared to Long Evans (LE) rats; F1 (SDxLE) and N2 generations exhibit intermediate phenotypes. We reported that APO increased S2/S1 ratios and reduced S1 amplitudes of the N40 event-related potential (ERP) in SD rats, suggesting that it reduced sensory gating and/or sensory registration. Here, we investigated whether SD and LE rats differ in sensitivity to APO effects on N40 gating or amplitude.

methodsPPI and N40 gating were assessed contemporaneously in male SD and LE rats after APO, in a 4-day within-subject design.

resultsCompared to SD rats, LE rats were less sensitive to the PPI-disruptive effects of APO. APO increased S2/S1 ratios paralleled by a dose-dependent reduction in S1 amplitude; SD and LE rats did not differ significantly in this measure. No clear relationship was evident between APO effects on PPI and N40 gating, nor between APO effects on startle magnitude and S1 amplitude, across strains.

conclusionSD and LE rats differ in their sensitivity to the disruptive effects of dopamine receptor activation on sensorimotor gating (PPI) but not sensory gating (N40 suppression) or sensory registration (S1 amplitude). These data suggest differences in both the neural and genetic regulation of dopamine agonist effects on these measures.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsApomorphineBehavior, AnimalDopamine AgonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMalePhenotypeRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeReflex, StartleApomorphineDopamine Agonists

Identifiers

PMID20080128
PMCPMC2834557
OpenAlexW2090720641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.