Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20077036›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2010

The current state of chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Philippe Collas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sequential ChIP-Seq.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation on Fixed Tissues and Cell Lines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Modern epigenetics methods in biological research.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philippe CollasInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian Center for Stem Cell Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. philippe.collas@medisin.uio.no
Norwegian Medical Association · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological significance of interactions of nuclear proteins with DNA in the context of gene expression, cell differentiation, or disease has immensely been enhanced by the advent of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). ChIP is a technique whereby a protein of interest is selectively immunoprecipitated from a chromatin preparation to determine the DNA sequences associated with it. ChIP has been widely used to map the localization of post-translationally modified histones, histone variants, transcription factors, or chromatin modifying enzymes on the genome or on a given locus. In spite of its power, ChIP has for a long time remained a cumbersome procedure requiring large numbers of cells. These limitations have sparked the development of modifications to shorten the procedure, simplify sample handling and make ChIP amenable to small numbers of cells. In addition, the combination of ChIP with DNA microarray and high-throughput sequencing technologies has in recent years enabled the profiling of histone modification, histone variants, and transcription factor occupancy on a genome-wide scale. This review highlights the variations on the theme of the ChIP assay, the various detection methods applied downstream of ChIP, and examples of their application.

Indexed as

ForecastingChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosome MappingGenetic Testing

Identifiers

PMID20077036
OpenAlexW2028403985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.