Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20075391›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2010

GSK690693 delays tumor onset and progression in genetically defined mouse models expressing activated Akt.

Deborah A Altomare, Lili Zhang, Jing Deng, Antonio Di Cristofano, Andres J Klein-Szanto, Rakesh Kumar, Joseph R Testa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. lncRNA ENSRNOT00000087717 mediated differentiation of satellite glial cells derived from dorsal root ganglion via AKT1.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah A AltomareWomen's Cancer, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA.
Lili Zhang
Jing Deng
Antonio Di Cristofano
Andres J Klein-Szanto
Rakesh Kumar
Joseph R Testa
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Therapeutic Micro RNA Strategies for Ovarian CancerP50CA083638 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI GODWIN, ANDREW K., GOLEMIS, ERICA A. · 1999 to 2013
$33.6M
Basis for Lymphomagenesis in Akt2 Transgenic MiceR01CA077429 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI TESTA, JOSEPH R. · 1998 to 2013
$4.7M
PTEN and the Molecular Genetics of Endometrial CancerR01CA097097 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI DI CRISTOFANO, ANTONIO · 2003 to 2012
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA06927NCI NIH HHS CA77429NCI NIH HHS CA83638NCI NIH HHS CA97097NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083638NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077429NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAkt plays a central role in regulating tumor cell survival and cell cycle progression and is regarded as a promising therapeutic target. We used genetically defined mouse models that develop spontaneous tumors exhibiting activated Akt to determine if Akt inhibition by GSK690693 is effective in the treatment of cancer. The broad long-term objective of this project was to use preclinical cancer models with precisely defined genetic lesions to elucidate the efficacy of targeting Akt with GSK690693. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe tested the in vivo effects of GSK690693 in Lck-MyrAkt2 transgenic mice that develop lymphomas, heterozygous Pten(+/-) knockout mice that exhibit endometrial tumors, and TgMISIIR-TAg-DR26 mice that develop ovarian carcinomas, all of which exhibit hyperactivation of Akt. In addition to standard disease onset and histology, tumors arising in treated animals were examined by immunohistochemistry to verify downregulated Akt signaling relative to placebo-treated mice. When possible, drug response was evaluated in tumor cell cultures by standard proliferation and apoptosis assays and by immunoblotting with various phosphospecific antibodies.

resultsGSK690693 exhibited efficacy irrespective of the mechanism of Akt activation involved. Interestingly, GSK690693 was most effective in delaying tumor progression in Lck-MyrAkt2 mice expressing a membrane-bound, constitutively active form of Akt. Both tumors and primary cell cultures displayed downregulation of the Akt pathway, increased apoptosis, and primarily decreased cell proliferation.

conclusionThese results suggest that GSK690693 or other Akt inhibitors might have therapeutic efficacy in human cancers with hyperactivated Akt and/or a dependence on Akt signaling for tumor progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEnzyme ActivationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMiceMice, TransgenicNeoplasmsNeoplasm TransplantationOncogene Protein v-aktOxadiazolesAntineoplastic AgentsGSK690693Oncogene Protein v-aktOxadiazolesProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20075391
PMCPMC2807995
OpenAlexW2153189553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.