Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20075260›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2010

Contributions of central and peripheral chemoreceptors to the ventilatory response to CO2/H+.

H V Forster, C A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nocturnal hypercapnia in obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation: from pathophysiology to measurement and treatment.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cerebrospinal fluid pH regulation.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Central respiratory chemoreception.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chemoreceptor mechanisms regulating COThe Journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  12. COInterface focus · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H V ForsterDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226-4801, USA. bforster@mcw.edu
C A Smith
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

HUMAN VENTILATORY ADAPTIONR01HL015469 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DEMPSEY, JEROME A · 1985 to 2011
$3.7M
Peripheral and Central Interactions in Ventilatory ControlR01HL050531 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SMITH, CURTIS A · 1995 to 2013
$3.3M
MECHANISM(S) OF HYPERNEA ELICITED BY CO2 INHALATIONR01HL025739 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FORSTER, HUBERT V · 1985 to 2010
$1.8M
HUMAN VENTILLATORY ADAPTATIONR37HL015469 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI DEMPSEY, JEROME A · 1988 to 1996
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-15469NHLBI NIH HHS HL-25739NHLBI NIH HHS HL-50531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major objective of this review is to evaluate existing information and reach conclusions regarding whether there is interaction between P(CO(2))/H(+) stimulation of carotid (peripheral) and intracranial (central) chemoreceptors. Interaction is defined as a ventilatory response to simultaneous changes in the degree of Pco2/H(+) stimulation of both chemoreceptors that is greater (hyperadditive) or less (hypoadditive) than the sum of the responses when stimulation of each set of chemoreceptors is individually altered. Simple summation of the simultaneous changes in stimuli results in no interaction (i.e., additive interaction). Knowledge of the nature of central/peripheral interaction is crucial for determining the physiological significance of newer models of ventilatory control based on recent neuroanatomic observations of the circuitry of key elements of the ventilatory control system. In this review, we will propose that these two sets of receptors are not functionally separate but rather that they are dependent on one another such that the sensitivity of the medullary chemoreceptors is critically determined by input from the peripheral chemoreceptors and possibly other breathing-related reflex afferents as well. The short format of this minireview demands that we be somewhat selective in developing our ideas. We will briefly discuss the limitations of experiments used to study CO(2)/H(+) sensitivity and interaction to date, traditional views of the relative contributions of peripheral and central chemoreceptors to CO(2)/H(+) sensitivity, the evidence for and against different types of interaction, and the effect of tonic carotid chemoreceptor afferent activity on central control mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbon DioxideCarotid BodyCentral Nervous SystemDisease Models, AnimalGoatsHumansPeripheral Nervous SystemPulmonary VentilationReceptors, Cell SurfaceCarbon Dioxidecarbon dioxide receptorReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID20075260
PMCPMC2853205
OpenAlexW2042843395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.