Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20075235›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2010

Biochemistry. CO2mmon sense.

Wolf B Frommer

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Carbon dioxide-sensing in organisms and its implications for human disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Regulation of gene expression by carbon dioxide.The Journal of physiology · 2011
    Review
  15. Genome sequences of the human body louse and its primary endosymbiont provide insights into the permanent parasitic lifestyle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  16. Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wolf B FrommerPlant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. wfrommer@stanford.edu

Funding

Sugar signaling networks detected by high content fluxomicxR01DK079109 · NIDDK · CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. · PI FROMMER, WOLF B · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBicarbonatesCarbon DioxideCarbonic AnhydrasesEvolution, MolecularHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPlantsPlant StomataTasteTaste BudsBicarbonatesCarbon DioxideCarbonic Anhydrases

Identifiers

PMID20075235
PMCPMC2992556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.