Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20075210›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2010

Array-based karyotyping for prognostic assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: performance comparison of Affymetrix 10K2.0, 250K Nsp, and SNP6.0 arrays.

Jill M Hagenkord, Federico A Monzon, Shera F Kash, Stan Lilleberg, Qingmei Xie, Jeffrey A Kant

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of copy neutral loss of heterozygosity and total genome aberrations on survival in myelodysplastic syndrome.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic approaches to chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jill M HagenkordMolecular Pathology and Clinical Genomics, Creighton University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, 601 N. 30 Street, Suite 2400, Omaha, NE 68131-2197, USA. jillhagenkord@creighton.edu
Federico A Monzon
Shera F Kash
Stan Lilleberg
Qingmei Xie
Jeffrey A Kant
Creighton University · USHouston Methodist · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific chromosomal alterations are recognized as important prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Array-based karyotyping is gaining acceptance as an alternative to the standard fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel for detecting these aberrations. This study explores the optimum single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array probe density for routine clinical use, presents clinical validation results for the 250K Nsp Affymetrix SNP array, and highlights clinically actionable genetic lesions missed by FISH and conventional cytogenetics. CLL samples were processed on low (10K2.0), medium (250K Nsp), and high (SNP6.0) probe density Affymetrix SNP arrays. Break point definition and detection rates for clinically relevant genetic lesions were compared. The 250K Nsp array was subsequently validated for routine clinical use and demonstrated 98.5% concordance with the standard CLL FISH panel. SNP array karyotyping detected genomic complexity and/or acquired uniparental disomy not detected by the FISH panel. In particular, a region of acquired uniparental disomy on 17p was shown to harbor two mutated copies of TP53 that would have gone undetected by FISH, conventional cytogenetics, or array comparative genomic hybridization. SNP array karyotyping allows genome-wide, high resolution detection of copy number and uniparental disomy at genomic regions with established prognostic significance in CLL, detects lesions missed by FISH, and provides insight into gene dosage at these loci.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsKaryotypingLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisB-LymphocytesCytogeneticsGene DeletionGenome, HumanHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLoss of HeterozygosityPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20075210
PMCPMC2871725
OpenAlexW1574122583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.