ReviewThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2010
International standards and reference materials for quantitative molecular infectious disease testing.
Review in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Approaches for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Using Multiple Biological Matrices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Implementation of a blood proficiency testing scheme for bacterial screening of platelet components.Vox sanguinis · 2025Article
- Mitigation of errors on an FDA-approved platform for cytomegalovirus viral load assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Accuracy of quantitative viral secondary standards: a re-examination.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Development and Characterization of Synthetic Norovirus RNA for Use in Molecular Detection Methods.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Standardization of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques by Calibration and Quantification to the First WHO International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.International journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Forty Years of Molecular Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Review
- Comparison of self-collected versus clinician collected cervicovaginal specimens for detection of high risk human papillomavirus among HIV infected women in Ethiopia.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Development of SARS-CoV-2 packaged RNA reference material for nucleic acid testing.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Hepatitis D: challenges in the estimation of true prevalence and laboratory diagnosis.Gut pathogens · 2021Review
- Development of a reference standard for the detection and quantification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by quantitative PCR.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Impact of Fragmentation on Commutability of Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus Quantitative Standards.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Comparison of Three Adenovirus Quantitative PCR Assays with ATCC Reference Strains and Clinical Samples.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Toward the Development of a Circulating Free DNA-BasedJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019Review
- Clinical correlation of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus load measured by digital PCR.PloS one · 2019Article
- Standardization of Nucleic Acid Tests: the Approach of the World Health Organization.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Review
- Copy Number Heterogeneity, Large Origin Tandem Repeats, and Interspecies Recombination in Human Herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) and HHV-6B Reference Strains.Journal of virology · 2018Article
- Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Progress in Quantitative Viral Load Testing: Variability and Impact of the WHO Quantitative International Standards.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of quantitative molecular diagnostics for patient management depends on the ability to relate patient results to prior results or to absolute values in clinical practice guidelines. To do this, those results need to be comparable across time and methods, either by producing the same value across methods and test versions or by using reliable and stable conversions. Universally available standards and reference materials specific to quantitative molecular technologies are critical to this process but are few in number. This review describes recent history in the establishment of international standards for nucleic acid test development, organizations involved in current efforts, and future issues and initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.