Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20074952›Full record

ArticleNeuromuscular disorders : NMD2010

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND): test development and reliability.

A M Glanzman, E Mazzone, M Main, M Pelliccioni, J Wood, K J Swoboda, C Scott, M Pane, S Messina, E Bertini and 2 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromuscular disorders : NMD, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 375 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

A M GlanzmanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. glanzmana@email.chop.edu
E Mazzone
M Main
M Pelliccioni
J Wood
K J Swoboda
C Scott
M Pane
S Messina
E Bertini
E Mercuri
R S Finkel
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity College London · GBAir Squared (United States) · USBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITPrimary Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR024134 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2006 to 2011
$70.4M
Newborn screening for identification & prospective followup of infants with SMAR01HD069045 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWOBODA, KATHRYN J. · 2011 to 2015
$4.3M
Therapeutic Opportunities in Spinal Muscular AtrophyR01HD054599 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWOBODA, KATHRYN J. · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024134NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR-024134NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054599NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motor skills of patients with spinal muscular atrophy, type I (SMA-I) are very limited. It is difficult to quantify the motor abilities of these patients and as a result there is currently no validated measure of motor function that can be utilized as an outcome measure in clinical trials of SMA-I. We have developed the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders ("CHOP INTEND") to evaluate the motor skills of patients with SMA-I. The test was developed following the evaluation of 26 infants with SMA-I mean age 11.5 months (1.4-37.9 months) with the Test of Infant Motor Performance and The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Test of Strength in SMA, a newly devised motor assessment for SMA. Items for the CHOP INTEND were selected by an expert panel based on item mean and standard deviation, item frequency distribution, and Chronbach's alpha. Intra-rater reliability of the resulting test was established by test-retest of 9 infants with SMA-I over a 2 month period; Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (3,1)=0.96. Interrater reliability was by video analysis of a mixed group of infants with neuromuscular disease by 4 evaluators; ICC (3,4)=0.98 and in a group of 8 typically developing infants by 5 evaluators ICC (3,5)=0.93. The face validity of the CHOP INTEND is supported by the use of an expert panel in item selection; however, further validation is needed. The CHOP INTEND is a reliable measure of motor skills in patients with SMA-I and neuromuscular disorders presenting in infancy.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansInfantMaleMotor SkillsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20074952
PMCPMC3260046
OpenAlexW1992974743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.