Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20074787›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2010

Resin-dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acid-etched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding.

Salvatore Sauro, Manuel Toledano, Fatima Sánchez Aguilera, Francesco Mannocci, David H Pashley, Franklin R Tay, Timothy F Watson, Raquel Osorio

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Remineralization of Artificial Dentin LesionJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Progress on matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer-A review.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2013
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Salvatore SauroBiomaterials Science, Biomimetics & Biophotonics Research Group, King's College London Dental Institute, Guy's Hospital, London, UK. salvatore.sauro@kcl.ac.uk
Manuel Toledano
Fatima Sánchez Aguilera
Francesco Mannocci
David H Pashley
Franklin R Tay
Timothy F Watson
Raquel Osorio
Universidad de Granada · ESAugusta University · USKing's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GB

Funding

Determinants of the Durability of Resin-Dentin BondsR01DE014911 · NIDCR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI PASHLEY, DAVID H · 2003 to 2006
$1.4M
Department of Health II-3A-1109-10046NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare resin-dentin bond strengths and the micropermeability of hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic resins bonded to acid-etched or EDTA-treated dentin, using the ethanol wet-bonding technique.

methodsFlat dentin surfaces from extracted human third molars were conditioned before bonding with: 37% H(3)PO(4) (15s) or 0.1M EDTA (60s). Five experimental resin blends of different hydrophilicities and one commercial adhesive (SBMP: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) were applied to ethanol wet-dentin (1 min) and light-cured (20s). The solvated resins were used as primers (50% ethanol/50% comonomers) and their respective neat resins were used as the adhesive. The resin-bonded teeth were stored in distilled water (24h) and sectioned in beams for microtensile bond strength testing. Modes of failure were examined by stereoscopic light microscopy and SEM. Confocal tandem scanning microscopy (TSM) interfacial characterization and micropermeability were also performed after filling the pulp chamber with 1 wt% aqueous rhodamine-B.

resultsThe most hydrophobic resin 1 gave the lowest bond strength values to acid-etched dentin and all beams failed prematurely when the resin was applied to EDTA-treated dentin. Resins 2 and 3 gave intermediate bond strengths to both conditioned substrates. Resin 4, an acidic hydrophilic resin, gave the highest bond strengths to both EDTA-treated and acid-etched dentin. Resin 5 was the only hydrophilic resin showing poor resin infiltration when applied on acid-etched dentin. SIGNIFICANCE: The ethanol wet-bonding technique may improve the infiltration of most of the adhesives used in this study into dentin, especially when applied to EDTA-treated dentin. The chemical composition of the resin blends was a determining factor influencing the ability of adhesives to bond to EDTA-treated or 37% H(3)PO(4) acid-etched dentin, when using the ethanol wet-bonding technique in a clinically relevant time period.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalChelating AgentsDental BondingDental Stress AnalysisDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsDentin PermeabilityEdetic AcidEthanolHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMaterials TestingMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhosphoric AcidsResin CementsChelating AgentsDentin-Bonding AgentsEdetic AcidEthanolPhosphoric AcidsResin CementsWater

Identifiers

PMID20074787
PMCPMC3824620
OpenAlexW1993848856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.