Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20073127›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: the light at the end of the tunnel?

Patrick Chames, Daniel Baty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PARPi Combining Nanoparticle LIN28B siRNA for the Management of Malignant Ascites.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Contemporary Management of Malignant Ascites.The Journal of surgical research · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Applications of synthetic biology in medical and pharmaceutical fields.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  18. Optical image-guided therapy of pancreatic cancer with an ultra-small bispecific protein.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick ChamesINSERM U624; GDR 3260; Marseille, France. patrick.chames@inserm.fr
Daniel Baty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With 23 approvals in the US and other countries and four approvals outside US, antibodies are now widely recognized as therapeutic molecules. The therapeutic and commercial successes met by rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab and other mAbs have inspired antibody engineers to improve the efficacy of these molecules. Consequently, a new wave of antibodies with engineered Fc leading to much higher effector functions such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity or complement-dependent cytotoxicity is being evaluated in the clinic, and several approvals are expected soon. In addition, research on a different class of antibody therapeutics, bispecific antibodies, has recently led to outstanding clinical results, and the first approval of the bispecific antibody catumaxomab, a T cell retargeting agent that was approved in the European Union in April 2009. This review describes the most recent advances and clinical study results in the field of bispecific antibodies, a new class of molecules that might outshine conventional mAbs as cancer immunotherapeutics in a near future.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAnimalsAntibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityDrug ApprovalEuropeGenetic EngineeringHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsNeoplasmsUnited StatesAntibodies, BispecificcatumaxomabImmunoglobulin Fc Fragments

Identifiers

PMID20073127
PMCPMC2791310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.