Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20072819›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural and functional genomics2010

Protein crystallization analysis on the World Community Grid.

Christian A Cumbaa, Igor Jurisica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deep learning applications in protein crystallography.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Using textons to rank crystallization droplets by the likely presence of crystals.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Some practical guidelines for UV imaging in the protein crystallization laboratory.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Super-Thresholding: Supervised Thresholding of Protein Crystal Images.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian A CumbaaDivision of Signaling Biology, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto Medical Discovery Tower, 9-305, 101 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Igor Jurisica

Funding

TOOLS FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT STRUCTURAL BIOLOGYU54GM074899 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI DETITTA, GEORGE T · 2005 to 2010
$16.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed an image-analysis and classification system for automatically scoring images from high-throughput protein crystallization trials. Image analysis for this system is performed by the Help Conquer Cancer (HCC) project on the World Community Grid. HCC calculates 12,375 distinct image features on microbatch-under-oil images from the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute's High-Throughput Screening Laboratory. Using HCC-computed image features and a massive training set of 165,351 hand-scored images, we have trained multiple Random Forest classifiers that accurately recognize multiple crystallization outcomes, including crystals, clear drops, precipitate, and others. The system successfully recognizes 80% of crystal-bearing images, 89% of precipitate images, and 98% of clear drops.

Indexed as

CrystallizationDiagnostic ImagingProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20072819
PMCPMC2857471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.