Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20072610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Prevalence and predictors of colposcopic-histopathologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.

Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe, Ramesh A Bhosale, Smita N Joshi, Anita N Kavatkar, Chandraprabha A Nagwanshi, Rohini S Kelkar, Cathy A Jenkins, Bryan E Shepherd, Seema Sahay, Arun R Risbud and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Study of Pap Smear in HIV-Positive Females.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epidemiology of cervical cancer with special focus on India.International journal of women's health · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vikrant V SahasrabuddheInstitute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. vikrant.sahasrabuddhe@vanderbilt.edu
Ramesh A Bhosale
Smita N Joshi
Anita N Kavatkar
Chandraprabha A Nagwanshi
Rohini S Kelkar
Cathy A Jenkins
Bryan E Shepherd
Seema Sahay
Arun R Risbud
Sten H Vermund
Sanjay M Mehendale
National AIDS Research Institute · INB. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INVanderbilt University · USTata Memorial Hospital · INVanderbilt Health · US

Funding

Vanderbilt University-CIDRZ AIDS International Training and Research ProgramD43TW001035 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 1998 to 2014
$10.9M
VIROLOGY COREP30AI054999 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2003 to 2011
$10.3M
Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-infected women in IndiaR21CA113465 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 2005 to 2006
$360k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001035FIC NIH HHS D43TW001035NCI NIH HHS R21 CA113465NCI NIH HHS R21CA113465NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI054999NIAID NIH HHS P30AI54999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevalence estimates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among HIV-infected women in India have been based on cervical cytology, which may have underestimated true disease burden. We sought to better establish prevalence estimates and evaluate risk factors of CIN among HIV-infected women in Pune, India using colposcopy and histopathology as diagnostic tools. METHODOLOGY: Previously unscreened, non-pregnant HIV-infected women underwent cervical cancer screening evaluation including standardized diagnostic colposcopy by a gynecologist. Histopathologic confirmation was conducted among consenting women with clinical suspicion of CIN. The prevalence of CIN was evaluated by a composite diagnosis based on colposcopy and histopathology results. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine independent predictors of increasing severity of CIN.

resultsThe median age of the n = 303 enrolled HIV-infected women was 30 years (interquartile range, 27-34). A majority of the participants were widowed or separated (187/303, 61.7%), more than one-third (114/302, 37.7%) were not educated beyond primary school, and nearly two-thirds (196/301, 64.7%) had a family per capita income of <1,000 Indian Rupees ( approximately US$22) per month. Cervical high-risk HPV-DNA was detected in 41.7% (124/297) of participants. The composite colposcopic-histopathologic diagnoses revealed no evidence of CIN in 220 out of 303 (72.6%) women, CIN1 in 33/303 (10.9%), CIN2 in 31/303 (10.2%), CIN3 in 18/303 (5.9%) and 1 (0.3%) woman was diagnosed with ICC. Thus, over a quarter of the participants [83/303: 27.7% (95% CI: 22.7-33.1)] had > or =CIN1 lesions and a sixth [50/303: 16.5% (95% CI: 12.2-21.9)] had evidence of advanced (> or =CIN2) neoplastic disease. The independent predictors of increasing severity of CIN as revealed by a proportional odds model using multivariable ordinal logistic regression included (i) currently receiving antiretroviral therapy [adjusted odds ratios (aOR): 2.24 (1.17, 4.26), p = 0.01] and (ii) presence of cervical high-risk HPV-DNA [aOR: 1.93 (1.13, 3.28), p = 0.02].

conclusionsHIV-infected women in Pune, India have a substantial burden of cervical precancerous lesions, which may progress to invasive cervical cancer unless appropriately detected and treated. Increased attention should focus on recognizing and addressing this entirely preventable cancer among HIV-infected women, especially in the context of increasing longevity due to antiretroviral therapy.

Indexed as

ColposcopyAdultFemaleHumansIndiaPrevalenceUterine Cervical Dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID20072610
PMCPMC2798747
OpenAlexW2001563463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.