Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20071390›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2010

Biophysics of magnetic orientation: strengthening the interface between theory and experimental design.

Joseph L Kirschvink, Michael Winklhofer, Michael M Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Environmental sources of radio frequency noise: potential impacts on magnetoreception.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Magnetosensation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Quantum magnetic imaging of iron organelles within the pigeon cochlea.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Modelling collective navigation via non-local communication.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Radical-pair-based magnetoreception in birds: radio-frequency experiments and the role of cryptochrome.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Magnetite in the human body: Biogenic vs. anthropogenic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph L KirschvinkDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. kirschvink@caltech.edu
Michael Winklhofer
Michael M Walker

Funding

Shape Control of Nanocrystalline Bacterial MagnetiteR21GM076417 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KIRSCHVINK, JOSEPH L · 2007 to 2009
$547k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R21GM76417NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM076417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first demonstrations of magnetic effects on the behaviour of migratory birds and homing pigeons in laboratory and field experiments, respectively, provided evidence for the longstanding hypothesis that animals such as birds that migrate and home over long distances would benefit from possession of a magnetic sense. Subsequent identification of at least two plausible biophysical mechanisms for magnetoreception in animals, one based on biogenic magnetite and another on radical-pair biochemical reactions, led to major efforts over recent decades to test predictions of the two models, as well as efforts to understand the ultrastructure and function of the possible magnetoreceptor cells. Unfortunately, progress in understanding the magnetic sense has been challenged by: (i) the availability of a relatively small number of techniques for analysing behavioural responses to magnetic fields by animals; (ii) difficulty in achieving reproducible results using the techniques; and (iii) difficulty in development and implementation of new techniques that might bring greater experimental power. As a consequence, laboratory and field techniques used to study the magnetic sense today remain substantially unchanged, despite the huge developments in technology and instrumentation since the techniques were developed in the 1950s. New methods developed for behavioural study of the magnetic sense over the last 30 years include the use of laboratory conditioning techniques and tracking devices based on transmission of radio signals to and from satellites. Here we consider methodological developments in the study of the magnetic sense and present suggestions for increasing the reproducibility and ease of interpretation of experimental studies. We recommend that future experiments invest more effort in automating control of experiments and data capture, control of stimulation and full blinding of experiments in the rare cases where automation is impossible. We also propose new experiments to confirm whether or not animals can detect magnetic fields using the radical-pair effect together with an alternate hypothesis that may explain the dependence on light of responses by animals to magnetic field stimuli.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationAnimalsBiophysicsBirdsElectromagnetic FieldsHumansLightModels, BiologicalOrientationPerception

Identifiers

PMID20071390
PMCPMC2843999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.