ReviewIntensive care medicine2010
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05902273 (The Value of Peripheral Arterial Resistive Index in Evaluation of Tissue Perfusion in Patients With Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 287 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Value of Peripheral Arterial Resistive Index in Evaluation of Tissue Perfusion in Patients With Septic Shock
Who cites it
287 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Recommendations for fluid management of adults with sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of guidelines.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- The Early Recognition and Management of Sepsis in Sub-Saharan African Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Pooled it
- Probiotics and Synbiotics Decrease Postoperative Sepsis in Elective Gastrointestinal Surgical Patients: a Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of an Emergency Department Code Sepsis Protocol: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Trial
- An overview of positive cultures and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a sub-analysis of the Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Improved Sepsis Alert With a Telephone Call From the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: A Clinical Trial.Medicine · 2015Trial
- Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Trial
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate SEP-1 Measure Compliance and Fluid Management in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Long-term trends in incidence and mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia; a retrospective population-based study from Central Norway 1996-2022.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Resuscitation Targets, Fluids, and Vasoactives in Septic Shock.Clinics in chest medicine · 2026Review
- Prioritized barriers to implementation of personalized immunotherapy for sepsis patients.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Supportive care and in-hospital mortality among children with suspected sepsis in Bamako, Mali.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and variations in recommendations.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Sepsis and the diverse organ-gastrointestinal tract axis.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or "the Campaign") developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations on process improvement and patient outcomes. DESIGN AND
settingA multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the ICU, ED, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the US, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were "bundled" into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 h and within 24 h. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008. MAIN
resultsData from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 years (P<0.0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 years (P = 0.008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37 to 30.8% over 2 years (P = 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 years (95% CI, 2.5-8.4%).
conclusionsThe Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.