ArticleHuman heredity2010
A Likelihood-Based Approach for Missing Genotype Data.
Article in Human heredity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual-based landscape genomics for conservation: An analysis pipeline.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Missing Data Methods for Partial Correlations.Journal of biometrics & biostatistics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Missing genotype data in a candidate gene association study can make it difficult to model the effects of multiple genetic variants simultaneously. In particular, when regression models are used to model phenotype as a function of SNP genotypes in several different genes, the most common approach is a complete case analysis, in which only individuals with no missing genotypes are included. But this can lead to substantial reduction in sample size and thus potential bias and loss in efficiency. A number of other methods for handling missing data are applicable, but have rarely been used in this context. The purpose of this paper is to describe how several standard methods for handling missing data can be applied or adapted to this problem, and to compare their performance using a simulation study. We demonstrate these techniques using an Alzheimer's disease association study. We show that the expectation-maximization algorithm and multiple imputation with a bootstrapped expectation-maximization sampling algorithm have the best properties of all the estimators studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.