Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20068300›Full record

ArticleCytogenetic and genome research2009

Cytogenetic and array-CGH characterization of a complex de novo rearrangement involving duplication and deletion of 9p and clinical findings in a 4-month-old female.

P J Hulick, K M Noonan, S Kulkarni, D J Donovan, M Listewnik, C Ihm, J M Stoler, S Weremowicz

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cytogenetic and genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P J HulickHarvard Partners Center for Genetics and Genomics, Medical Genetics Program and MGH Clinic, Boston, Mass, USA.
K M Noonan
S Kulkarni
D J Donovan
M Listewnik
C Ihm
J M Stoler
S Weremowicz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 15 patients with partial trisomy 9p involving de novo duplications have been previously described. Here, we present clinical, cytogenetic, FISH and aCGH findings in a patient with a de novo complex rearrangement in the short arm of chromosome 9 involving an inverted duplication at 9p24-->p21.3 and a deletion at 9pter-->p24.2. FISH probes generated from BACs selected from the UCSC genome browser were utilized to verify this rearrangement. It is likely that some previously described duplications of 9p may also be products of complex chromosomal aberrations. This report in which FISH and aCGH were used to more comprehensively characterize the genomic rearrangement in a patient with clinical manifestations of 9p duplication syndrome underscores the importance of further characterizing cytogenetically detected rearrangements.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAbnormalities, MultipleChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 9Comparative Genomic HybridizationCytogenetic AnalysisDevelopmental DisabilitiesEye AbnormalitiesFemaleGene DuplicationHumansInfantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMicrognathism

Identifiers

PMID20068300
PMCPMC3711006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.