Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20068152›Full record

ReviewCancer research2010

Defective mismatch repair, microsatellite mutation bias, and variability in clinical cancer phenotypes.

Sandeep N Shah, Suzanne E Hile, Kristin A Eckert

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Low microsatellite instability revisited: a review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Instability in the Penta-C and Penta-D Loci in Microsatellite-Unstable Endometrial Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandeep N ShahDepartment of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
Suzanne E Hile
Kristin A Eckert
Cancer Research Foundation · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

DNA replication, DNA repair and microsatellite stabilityR01CA100060 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellite instability is associated with 10% to 15% of colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, and gastric cancers, and has long been used as a diagnostic tool for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma-related cancers. Tumor-specific length alterations within microsatellites are generally accepted to be a consequence of strand slippage events during DNA replication, which are uncorrected due to a defective postreplication mismatch repair (MMR) system. Mutations arising within microsatellites associated with critical target genes are believed to play a causative role in the evolution of MMR-defective tumors. In this review, we summarize current evidence of mutational biases within microsatellites arising as a consequence of intrinsic DNA sequence effects as well as variation in MMR efficiency. Microsatellite mutational biases are generally not considered during clinical testing; however, we suggest that such biases may be clinically significant as a factor contributing to phenotypic variation among microsatellite instability-positive tumors.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairMicrosatellite InstabilityAnimalsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20068152
PMCPMC2807994
OpenAlexW2102767793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.