Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20067394›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2010

The whisker nuisance task identifies a late-onset, persistent sensory sensitivity in diffuse brain-injured rats.

Katelyn C S McNamara, Amanda M Lisembee, Jonathan Lifshitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of whisker stress in cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Aberrant Somatosensory Processing and Connectivity in Mice LackingThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katelyn C S McNamaraSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0509, USA.
Amanda M Lisembee
Jonathan Lifshitz
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

UK Spinal Cord &Brain Injury Research Center Core GrantP30NS051220 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HALL, EDWARD D. · 2005 to 2015
$6.4M
Neural circuit disruption by diffuse brain injury: basis for morbidity & therapyR01NS065052 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS051220NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-traumatic morbidity reduces the quality of life for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors by altering neuropsychological function. After midline fluid percussion injury (FPI), diffuse pathology in the ventral posterior thalamus suggests that somatosensory whisker function may be impaired post-injury. The goals of the present study were to design and validate a task to detect injury-induced somatosensory morbidity (Experiment 1), and to evaluate preliminary applications of the task (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to moderate FPI (approximately 1.9 atm) or sham injury. Over an 8-week time course, the whiskers on both mystacial pads were stimulated manually with an applicator stick in an open field for three 5-min periods. Behavioral responses in this whisker nuisance task were recorded using objective criteria (max score = 16). Sham animals were ambivalent or soothed by whisker stimulation (4.0 +/- 0.8), whereas brain-injured rats showed aggravated responses at 1 week (6.7 +/- 0.9), which became significant at 4 weeks (9.5 +/- 0.5) and 8 weeks (8.4 +/- 1.1) compared to sham injury, indicating chronic injury-induced sensory sensitivity. Total free serum corticosterone levels indicated a significant stress response in brain-injured (125.0 +/- 17.7 ng/mL), but not uninjured animals (74.2 +/- 12.2 ng/mL) in response to whisker stimulation. In Experiment 2, to evaluate applications of the whisker nuisance task, four additional uninjured and brain-injured groups were subjected to mild brain injury only, shaved whiskers after moderate brain injury, repeated whisker nuisance task stimulation after moderate brain injury, or regular opportunities for tactile exploration of an enriched environment after moderate brain injury over 4 weeks post-injury. The whisker nuisance task has the sensitivity to detect mild brain injury (7.7 +/- 1.0), but morbidity was not mitigated by any of the neurorehabilitative interventions. Following diffuse brain injury, the whisker nuisance task is a promising tool to detect post-traumatic morbidity and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions that may restore discrete circuit function in brain-injured patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesCorticosteroneDiffuse Axonal InjuryDisability EvaluationDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorMaleNeurologic ExaminationNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysical StimulationPredictive Value of TestsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySensory ThresholdsCorticosterone

Identifiers

PMID20067394
PMCPMC2867628
OpenAlexW2088125540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.