Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20067338›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2010

Integrating prokaryotes and eukaryotes: DNA transposases in light of structure.

Alison Burgess Hickman, Michael Chandler, Fred Dyda

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How RAG1/2 evolved from ancestral transposases to initiate V(D)J recombination without transposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  11. Biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional Characterization of the N-Terminal Disordered Region of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison Burgess HickmanLaboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ahickman@helix.nih.gov
Michael Chandler
Fred Dyda
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires · FR

Funding

Structure and function of eukaryotic DNA transposasesZIADK036153 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI DYDA, FRED · 2009 to 2025
$18.9M
Structure and function of novel prokaryotic DNA transposasesZIADK036154 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI DYDA, FREDERICK · 2009 to 2023
$7.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA rearrangements are important in genome function and evolution. Genetic material can be rearranged inadvertently during processes such as DNA repair, or can be moved in a controlled manner by enzymes specifically dedicated to the task. DNA transposases comprise one class of such enzymes. These move DNA segments known as transposons to new locations, without the need for sequence homology between transposon and target site. Several biochemically distinct pathways have evolved for DNA transposition, and genetic and biochemical studies have provided valuable insights into many of these. However, structural information on transposases - particularly with DNA substrates - has proven elusive in most cases. On the other hand, large-scale genome sequencing projects have led to an explosion in the number of annotated prokaryotic and eukaryotic mobile elements. Here, we briefly review biochemical and mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition, and propose that integrating sequence information with structural information using bioinformatics tools such as secondary structure prediction and protein threading can lead not only to an additional level of understanding but possibly also to testable hypotheses regarding transposition mechanisms. Detailed understanding of transposition pathways is a prerequisite for the long-term goal of exploiting DNA transposons as genetic tools and as a basis for genetic medical applications.

Indexed as

TransposasesAnimalsBacteriaDNAEukaryotaGene RearrangementGenomeGenomic InstabilityHumansStructure-Activity RelationshipDNATransposases

Identifiers

PMID20067338
PMCPMC3107681
OpenAlexW2093427592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.