Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20067335›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2010

Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Teun M Post, Serge C L M Cremers, Thomas Kerbusch, Meindert Danhof

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of a home-based resistance exercise program in elderly participants with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacology of bisphosphonates.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mathematical modeling of postmenopausal osteoporosis and its treatment by the anti-catabolic drug denosumab.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Osteoanabolics.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2012
    Article
  20. Coping with time scales in disease systems analysis: application to bone remodeling.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Teun M PostPharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacometrics (P3), Schering-Plough, Oss, The Netherlands.
Serge C L M Cremers
Thomas Kerbusch
Meindert Danhof
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic progressive disorder and is regarded as an important worldwide health issue. The development of novel treatments and the comparison of the effects of novel and existing treatments in osteoporosis are complicated by the difficulties of establishing drug effects on disease progression, as reflected in the slowly changing primary biomarker, bone mineral density. In recent years, research has considerably improved our understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Specifically, various biomarkers have been identified that reflect bone physiology at the cellular level. These biomarkers mirror the dynamics of bone formation and degradation on a shorter timescale than bone mineral density as a composite measure. These markers can therefore, in principle, be used to characterize the underlying regulatory system and to quantify drug effects in osteoporosis. Recently, the concept of disease system analysis has been proposed as a novel approach to characterize, in a strictly quantitative manner, drug effects on disease progression. This approach integrates physiology, disease progression and drug treatment in a comprehensive mechanism-based model, using dynamic information on a network of biomarkers. This review focuses on the use of disease system analysis for the characterization of drug effects on osteoporosis. It is concluded that, although the development of fully mechanistic disease system models may be practically impossible, parsimonious--but mechanism-based--disease system models may ultimately be used to adequately predict the long-term effects of drug treatment on clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Systems AnalysisBiomarkersBone and BonesBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, BoneHumansModels, BiologicalOsteoporosisRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BSignal TransductionBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B

Identifiers

PMID20067335
OpenAlexW2142080629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.