Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20066436›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2010

Differential detection of Brugia malayi and Brugia pahangi by real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR and its evaluation for diagnosis of B. pahangi-infected dogs.

Tongjit Thanchomnang, Pewpan M Intapan, Sudchit Chungpivat, Viraphong Lulitanond, Wanchai Maleewong

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New Insights into the Phylogeographic History ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Current Status of the Diagnosis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Molecular Analysis of Canine Filaria and ItsPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tongjit ThanchomnangDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Pewpan M Intapan
Sudchit Chungpivat
Viraphong Lulitanond
Wanchai Maleewong
Khon Kaen University · THChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR combined with melting curve analysis was developed for differentiating Brugia malayi and Brugia pahangi DNA in host blood using one set of primers and fluorophore-labeled hybridization probes specific for HhaI repetitive DNA. The differentiation of both species was based on their melting temperatures (Tm). The mean Tm +/- SD of B. malayi and B. pahangi were 56.18+/-0.21 and 52.49+/-0.07, respectively. The method was used for the molecular detection of B. pahangi in infected dog blood samples. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy,and positive and negative predictive values of this method were 100%. The detected mean difference of the Tm might allow the simple discrimination of two related species. This method is fast, sensitive, allows for a high throughput, can be performed on very small volumes, and has potential for diagnosis of B. pahangi-infected dogs in endemic areas as well as for large epidemiological investigations.

Indexed as

Fluorescence Resonance Energy TransferAnimalsBloodBrugia malayiBrugia pahangiDNA PrimersDog DiseasesDogsFilariasisOligonucleotide ProbesPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTransition TemperatureDNA PrimersOligonucleotide Probes

Identifiers

PMID20066436
OpenAlexW2051438507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.