Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20066149›Full record

ArticleCurrent cardiology reviews2009

The evolving roles of nuclear cardiology.

Andrea De Lorenzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current cardiology reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Machine learning for nuclear cardiology: The way forward.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea De LorenzoInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of cardiac imaging modalities has grown steadily, and cardiac nuclear studies constitute a large part of this number. Nuclear Cardiology is often mistakenly considered a synonym of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), but has broader applications, including metabolic imaging, innervation imaging, among other technologies. MPI has been a powerful diagnostic and prognostic tool in the assessment of patients for known or suspected CAD for decades, and is now increasingly used for the evaluation of the anti-ischemic effects of various therapies, according to changes in left ventricular perfusion defect size defined by sequential MPI. Neuronal dysfunction identified with iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine may give information on prognosis in different disease conditions, such as after myocardial infarction, in diabetes and dilated cardiomyopathy. Molecular imaging may identify the predominant cellular population in the atherosclerotic plaque and help predict the likelihood of clinical events. Therefore, although its usefulness is well established, Nuclear Cardiology remains a moving science, whose roles keep in pace with evolving clinical needs and expectations.

Indexed as

Myocardial perfusion imagingpositron emission tomography.single-photon emission computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID20066149
PMCPMC2803289
OpenAlexW2080791421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.