Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20066100›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2009

Cell adhesion, the backbone of the synapse: "vertebrate" and "invertebrate" perspectives.

Nikolaos Giagtzoglou, Cindy V Ly, Hugo J Bellen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineering Functional Membrane-Membrane Interfaces by InterSpy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaos GiagtzoglouHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. giagtzog@bcm.tmc.edu
Cindy V Ly
Hugo J Bellen
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapses are asymmetric intercellular junctions that mediate neuronal communication. The number, type, and connectivity patterns of synapses determine the formation, maintenance, and function of neural circuitries. The complexity and specificity of synaptogenesis relies upon modulation of adhesive properties, which regulate contact initiation, synapse formation, maturation, and functional plasticity. Disruption of adhesion may result in structural and functional imbalance that may lead to neurodevelopmental diseases, such as autism, or neurodegeneration, such as Alzheimer's disease. Therefore, understanding the roles of different adhesion protein families in synapse formation is crucial for unraveling the biology of neuronal circuit formation, as well as the pathogenesis of some brain disorders. The present review summarizes some of the knowledge that has been acquired in vertebrate and invertebrate genetic model organisms.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionAnimalsCadherinsHumansLeucineMental DisordersModels, BiologicalNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionVertebratesCadherinsLeucine

Identifiers

PMID20066100
PMCPMC2773626
OpenAlexW2098092575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.