Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20066091›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2009

Wnt signaling from development to disease: insights from model systems.

Ken M Cadigan, Mark Peifer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ken M CadiganDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, USA.
Mark Peifer
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

A model system to study the tumor suppressor APCR01GM067236 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PEIFER, MARK A. · 2002 to 2015
$2.8M
Transcriptional Activation by Wnt SignalingR01GM082994 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CADIGAN, KENNETH M · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067236NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082994NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM67236NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM82994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the early surprises in the study of cell adhesion was the discovery that beta-catenin plays dual roles, serving as an essential component of cadherin-based cell-cell adherens junctions and also serving as the key regulated effector of the Wnt signaling pathway. Here, we review our current model of Wnt signaling and discuss how recent work using model organisms has advanced our understanding of the roles Wnt signaling plays in both normal development and in disease. These data help flesh out the mechanisms of signaling from the membrane to the nucleus, revealing new protein players and providing novel information about known components of the pathway.

Indexed as

Animalsbeta CateninCell AdhesionCell MembraneCell NucleusDisease Models, AnimalDrosophilaHumansModels, BiologicalProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSignal TransductionWnt ProteinsXenopusbeta CateninWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20066091
PMCPMC2742092
OpenAlexW2129112935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.