Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20066086›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2009

Chemical gradients and chemotropism in yeast.

Robert A Arkowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Harnessing Fungi Signaling in Living Composites.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert A ArkowitzInstitute of Developmental Biology and Cancer, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis-CNRS UMR6543, Centre de Biochimie, Faculté des Sciences, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice Cedex 2, France. arkowitz@unice.fr
Institut de Biologie Valrose · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical gradients of peptide mating pheromones are necessary for directional growth, which is critical for yeast mating. These gradients are generated by cell-type specific secretion or export and specific degradation in receiving cells. Spatial information is sensed by dedicated seven-transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors and yeast cells are able to detect extremely small differences in ligand concentration across their approximately 5-microm cell surface. Here, I will discuss our current knowledge of how cells detect and respond to such shallow chemical gradients and in particular what is known about the proteins that are involved in directional growth and the establishment of the polarity axis during yeast mating.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionActinsCell PolarityCell ShapeChemotaxisFungal ProteinsGenes, FungalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticPheromonesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastsActinsFungal ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsLigandsPheromonesReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID20066086
PMCPMC2742094
OpenAlexW2096830210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.