Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20065276›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine

Suicide inquiry in primary care: creating context, inquiring, and following up.

Steven D Vannoy, Tonya Fancher, Caitlyn Meltvedt, Jürgen Unützer, Paul Duberstein, Richard L Kravitz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. National pathways for suicide prevention and health services research.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014
    Review
  10. Addressing suicidality in primary care settings.Current psychiatry reports · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven D VannoyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. svannoy@u.washington.edu
Tonya Fancher
Caitlyn Meltvedt
Jürgen Unützer
Paul Duberstein
Richard L Kravitz

Funding

Institute for Translational Health Science (KL2)KL2RR025015 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$9.3M
Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
Therapist Factors Research ProgramP50MH073511 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZANE, NOLAN · 2007 to 2011
$3.8M
Consumer Influences of Treatment of DepressionR01MH064683 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2002 to 2004
$2.1M
LLD Course & Treatment Decisions: Psychosocial InfluencesK24MH072712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DUBERSTEIN, PAUL R · 2006 to 2010
$722k
Improving Care for Comorbid Physical and Mental IllnessK24MH072756 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2009
$643k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR025015NIMH NIH HHS K24MH072712NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH072756NIMH NIH HHS K24MH72756NIMH NIH HHS P50MH073511NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064683NIMH NIH HHS T32MH73553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide.

methodsOne hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53% to 61% of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality.

resultsMost suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, "Are you feeling like hurting yourself?"); (2) supportive framing (eg, "Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?"); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, "You're not feeling suicidal, are you?"). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79%) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86%) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, "I hope you would tell me if you did.").

conclusionAlthough most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePhysician-Patient RelationsSuicide PreventionAntidepressive AgentsCaliforniaDepressionFemaleHumansMaleNew YorkPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SimulationPhysicians, FamilyTape RecordingAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20065276
PMCPMC2807385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.