Trial reportAnnals of family medicine
Suicide inquiry in primary care: creating context, inquiring, and following up.
Trial report in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of targeted and tailored patient depression engagement interventions on patient-physician discussion of suicidal thoughts: a randomized control trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Trial
- Recognising and Responding to Suicide-Risk Factors in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2024Article
- Mental Health Nursing Student's Perception of Clinical Simulation about Patients at Risk of Suicide: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Stakeholder views regarding a planned primary care office-based interactive multimedia suicide prevention tool.Patient education and counseling · 2019Article
- Recognizing and Reacting to Risk Signs for Patient Suicide.Seminars in hearing · 2018Review
- Understanding and Approaching The Increase in Suicide Rate With a Special Focus on the State Of Delaware.Delaware journal of public health · 2016Article
- Suicide risk and associated demographic and clinical correlates among primary care patients with recent drug use.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2016Article
- Suicide Risk Assessments: Which Suicide Risk Factors Psychiatric Residents Consider Significant?Psychiatry investigation · 2015Article
- National pathways for suicide prevention and health services research.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014Review
- Addressing suicidality in primary care settings.Current psychiatry reports · 2012Review
- Self-perceived Difficulties With Suicidal Patients in A Sample of Italian General Practitioners.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2011Article
- Now what should I do? Primary care physicians' responses to older adults expressing thoughts of suicide.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011Article
- The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patient methodology to assess healthcare communication.Patient education and counseling · 2011Review
- In this issue:race, place, and sex matter.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide.
methodsOne hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53% to 61% of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality.
resultsMost suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, "Are you feeling like hurting yourself?"); (2) supportive framing (eg, "Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?"); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, "You're not feeling suicidal, are you?"). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79%) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86%) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, "I hope you would tell me if you did.").
conclusionAlthough most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.