Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20064975›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2010

Pharmacological analysis of Drosophila melanogaster gamma-secretase with respect to differential proteolysis of Notch and APP.

Casper Groth, W Gregory Alvord, Octavio A Quiñones, Mark E Fortini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Signaling pathways and their potential therapeutic utility in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Casper GrothDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Bluemle Life Sciences Building 830A, 233 South 10 Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
W Gregory Alvord
Octavio A Quiñones
Mark E Fortini
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Trafficking and Proteolysis of Notch and Other Gamma-Secretase SubstratesR01GM087650 · NIGMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI FORTINI, MARK E · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS HHSN2612008000016CNIGMS NIH HHS GM087650NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gamma-secretase aspartyl protease is responsible for the cleavage of numerous type I integral membrane proteins, including amyloid precursor protein (APP) and Notch. APP cleavage contributes to the generation of toxic amyloid beta peptides in Alzheimer's disease, whereas cleavage of the Notch receptor is required for normal physiological signaling between differentiating cells. Mutagenesis studies as well as in vivo analyses of Notch and APP activity in the presence of pharmacological inhibitors indicate that these substrates can be differentially modulated by inhibition of mammalian gamma-secretase, although some biochemical studies instead show nearly identical dose-response inhibitor effects on Notch and APP cleavages. Here, we examine the dose-response effects of several inhibitors on Notch and APP in Drosophila melanogaster cells, which possess a homogeneous form of gamma-secretase. Four different inhibitors that target different domains of gamma-secretase exhibit similar dose-response effects for both substrates, including rank order of inhibitor potencies and effective concentration ranges. For two inhibitors, modest differences in inhibitor dose responses toward Notch and APP were detected, suggesting that inhibitors might be identified that possess some discrimination in their ability to target alternative gamma-secretase substrates. These findings also indicate that despite an overall conservation in inhibitor potencies toward different gamma-secretase substrates, quantitative differences might exist that could be relevant for the development of therapeutically valuable substrate-specific inhibitors.

Indexed as

Amyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsProtease InhibitorsReceptors, NotchAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAppl protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsN protein, DrosophilaProtease InhibitorsReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID20064975
PMCPMC2845938
OpenAlexW2169355804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.