Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20064806›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

The impact of computerized provider order entry on medication errors in a multispecialty group practice.

Emily Beth Devine, Ryan N Hansen, Jennifer L Wilson-Norton, N M Lawless, Albert W Fisk, David K Blough, Diane P Martin, Sean D Sullivan

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Guideline-based Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems on the Chemotherapy Order Process: a Systematic Review.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily Beth DevinePharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7630, USA. bdevine@u.washington.edu
Ryan N Hansen
Jennifer L Wilson-Norton
N M Lawless
Albert W Fisk
David K Blough
Diane P Martin
Sean D Sullivan

Funding

Evaluating e-Prescribing in a Community-based, Integrated Health SystemK08HS014739 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEVINE, EMILY BETH · 2006 to 2010
$510k
Evaluating the Impact of an ACPOE/CDS System on OutcomesUC1HS015319 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, SEAN D · 2004 to 2006
$235k
AHRQ HHS 5-K08-HS014739AHRQ HHS 5-UC1 HS015319AHRQ HHS K08 HS014739AHRQ HHS UC1 HS015319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComputerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been shown to improve patient safety by reducing medication errors and subsequent adverse drug events (ADEs). Studies demonstrating these benefits have been conducted primarily in the inpatient setting, with fewer in the ambulatory setting. The objective was to evaluate the effect of a basic, ambulatory CPOE system on medication errors and associated ADEs.

designThis quasiexperimental, pretest-post-test study was conducted in a community-based, multispecialty health system not affiliated with an academic medical center. The intervention was a basic CPOE system with limited clinical decision support capabilities. MEASUREMENT: Comparison of prescriptions written before (n=5016 handwritten) to after (n=5153 electronically prescribed) implementation of the CPOE system. The primary outcome was the occurrence of error(s); secondary outcomes were types and severity of errors.

resultsFrequency of errors declined from 18.2% to 8.2%-a reduction in adjusted odds of 70% (OR: 0.30; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.40). The largest reductions were seen in adjusted odds of errors of illegibility (97%), use of inappropriate abbreviations (94%) and missing information (85%). There was a 57% reduction in adjusted odds of errors that did not cause harm (potential ADEs) (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.49). The reduction in the number of errors that caused harm (preventable ADEs) was not statistically significant, perhaps due to few errors in this category.

conclusionsA basic CPOE system in a community setting was associated with a significant reduction in medication errors of most types and severity levels.

Indexed as

Electronic PrescribingMedical Order Entry SystemsMedication SystemsAgedAmbulatory Care Information SystemsCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedication ErrorsMulti-Institutional SystemsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20064806
PMCPMC2995630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.