Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20064559›Full record

ArticleImmunology letters2010

C3d adjuvant activity is reduced by altering residues involved in the electronegative binding of C3d to CR2.

Franklin R Toapanta, Dilhari R DeAlmeida, Matthew D Dunn, Ted M Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrostatic Steering Accelerates C3d:CR2 Association.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franklin R ToapantaUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Center for Vaccine Research, 9047 Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. ftoapanta@medicine.umaryland.edu <ftoapanta@medicine.umaryland.edu>
Dilhari R DeAlmeida
Matthew D Dunn
Ted M Ross
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Biological Models of Influenza A VirusR01GM083602 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CLERMONT, GILLES · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS NIH R01 GM083602-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The final degradation product of the complement protein C3, C3d, has been used as a molecular adjuvant to various antigens. Chimera proteins of the antigen and multiple copies of C3d were developed to test the adjuvant effect of this molecule. The main mechanism by which C3d enhances the immune response is interaction with CR2. In vitro studies showed that the avidity of C3d for CR2 is affected by residues located at the interacting surface (e.g. 170N) as well as by residues located in other areas. The role of the latter residues has been proposed to depend on the electrostatic nature of the C3d-CR2 interaction, where the charges of the whole molecules are responsible for their binding. C3d is primarily a negatively charged molecule, while CR2 is a positive one. Previous experiments demonstrated that elimination of a positive charge (K162A) in C3d enhanced its avidity for CR2, while elimination of negative charges or addition positives ones (D163A, N170R, respectively), impaired the avidity for CR2. Despite the extensive in vitro research, the role of these residues in the adjuvant effect of C3d is unclear. To study the role of residues at the interacting and non-interacting surface of C3d on the adjuvanticity, single as well as a double residue substitutions were engineered in the murine C3d (R162A, D163A, N170R and D163A-N170R) gene. Two copies of these mutant molecules were fused to HIV-1 Env(gp120) and the proteins were tested for their avidity to bind CR2 (sCR2). Later, these DNA constructs were tested in mice to determine their adjuvant capability. Mutation at residue 162 (R162A) neither enhanced nor impaired the avidity of Env(gp120)-C3d(2) for sCR2 in vitro. Mutations at residues D163A and N170R, on the other hand, reduced the binding affinity of Env(gp120)-C3d(2) for sCR2. Furthermore, these mutations synergized and abolished the interaction of C3d for CR2. The data correlated with the adjuvant capability of these molecules in the mouse model. In summary, residues that alter the electronegative status of C3d (D163A and N170R) impair the binding of chimera proteins to CR2, reducing the adjuvant activity of this molecule.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineComplement C3dFemaleGene DosageHIV Envelope Protein gp120ImmunityMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein BindingProtein EngineeringReceptors, Complement 3dRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAdjuvants, ImmunologicComplement C3dHIV Envelope Protein gp120Receptors, Complement 3dRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20064559
PMCPMC3755894
OpenAlexW1995968003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.