Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20064217›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2010

High prevalence of autoantibodies to RNA helicase A in Mexican patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Monica Vázquez-Del Mercado, Claudia A Palafox-Sánchez, Jose F Muñoz-Valle, Gerardo Orozco-Barocio, Edith Oregon-Romero, Rosa E Navarro-Hernández, Mario Salazar-Páramo, Juan Armendariz-Borunda, Jorge I Gámez-Nava, Laura Gonzalez-Lopez and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Do we need new autoantibodies in lupus?Arthritis research & therapy · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica Vázquez-Del MercadoDepartamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, Instituto de Investigación en Reumatología y del Sistema Músculo Esquelético, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Sierra Mojada 950, Guadalajara, Jalisco, CP 44340, México. dravme@hotmail.com
Claudia A Palafox-Sánchez
Jose F Muñoz-Valle
Gerardo Orozco-Barocio
Edith Oregon-Romero
Rosa E Navarro-Hernández
Mario Salazar-Páramo
Juan Armendariz-Borunda
Jorge I Gámez-Nava
Laura Gonzalez-Lopez
Jason Yf Chan
Edward Kl Chan
Minoru Satoh
Universidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversity of Florida · USFlorida College · USSecretaría de Salud de Jalisco · MX

Funding

Novel Proteins Associated with SS-A/Ro in Target OrgansR01AI047859 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHAN, EDWARD K · 2001 to 2011
$3.1M
NOVEL PROTEINS ASSOCIATED WITH SS-A/RO IN TARGET ORGANSR21AI047859 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHAN, EDWARD K · 2000 to 2000
$310k
NIAID NIH HHS AI47859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutoantibodies to RNA helicase A (RHA) were reported as a new serological marker of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) associated with early stage of the disease. Anti-RHA and other autoantibodies in Mexican SLE patients and their correlation with clinical and immunological features were examined.

methodsAutoantibodies in sera from 62 Mexican SLE patients were tested by immunoprecipitation of 35S-labeled K562 cell extract and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (anti-U1RNP/Sm, ribosomal P, beta2GPI, and dsDNA). Anti-RHA was screened based on the immunoprecipitation of the 140-kDa protein, the identity of which was verified by Western blot using rabbit anti-RHA serum. Clinical and immunological characteristics of anti-RHA-positive patients were analyzed.

resultsAnti-RHA was detected in 23% (14/62) of patients, a prevalence higher than that of anti-Sm (13%, 8/62). Prevalence and levels of various autoantibodies were not clearly different between anti-RHA (+) vs. (-) cases, although there was a trend of higher levels of anti-RHA antibodies in patients without anti-U1RNP/Sm (P = 0.07). Both anti-RHA and -Sm were common in cases within one year of diagnosis; however, the prevalence and levels of anti-RHA in patients years after diagnosis did not reduce dramatically, unlike a previous report in American patients. This suggests that the high prevalence of anti-RHA in Mexican patients may be due to relatively stable production of anti-RHA.

conclusionsAnti-RHA was detected at high prevalence in Mexican SLE patients. Detection of anti-RHA in races in which anti-Sm is not common should be clinically useful. Racial difference in the clinical significance of anti-RHA should be clarified in future studies.

Indexed as

AdultAge of OnsetAutoantibodiesAutoantigensBlotting, WesternDEAD-box RNA HelicasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoprecipitationLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMexicoMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsPrevalenceSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAutoantibodiesAutoantigensDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDHX9 protein, humanNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20064217
PMCPMC2875632
OpenAlexW2101467169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.