Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20064210›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2010

Do electronic health records affect the patient-psychiatrist relationship? A before & after study of psychiatric outpatients.

Randall F Stewart, Philip J Kroth, Mark Schuyler, Robert Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient experiences with electronic medical records: lessons learned.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Randall F StewartHealth Sciences Library & Informatics Center, MSC09 5100, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. randallfstewart@gmail.com
Philip J Kroth
Mark Schuyler
Robert Bailey
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

ZUNI KIDNEY PROJECT STUDY I--POPULATION BASED SURVEY OF RENAL DISEASEM01RR000997 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HART, BLAINE · 1985 to 2010
$30.0M
Electronic Psychiatric Charting/Patient-PhysicianF37LM008747 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI STEWART, RANDALL · 2005 to 2007
$199k
NCRR NIH HHS 5M01-RR00997NLM NIH HHS 1F37 LM008747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of literature shows that patients accept the use of computers in clinical care. Nonetheless, studies have shown that computers unequivocally change both verbal and non-verbal communication style and increase patients' concerns about the privacy of their records. We found no studies which evaluated the use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) specifically on psychiatric patient satisfaction, nor any that took place exclusively in a psychiatric treatment setting. Due to the special reliance on communication for psychiatric diagnosis and evaluation, and the emphasis on confidentiality of psychiatric records, the results of previous studies may not apply equally to psychiatric patients.

methodWe examined the association between EHR use and changes to the patient-psychiatrist relationship. A patient satisfaction survey was administered to psychiatric patient volunteers prior to and following implementation of an EHR. All subjects were adult outpatients with chronic mental illness.

resultsSurvey responses were grouped into categories of "Overall," "Technical," "Interpersonal," "Communication & Education,," "Time," "Confidentiality," "Anxiety," and "Computer Use." Multiple, unpaired, two-tailed t-tests comparing pre- and post-implementation groups showed no significant differences (at the 0.05 level) to any questionnaire category for all subjects combined or when subjects were stratified by primary diagnosis category.

conclusionsWhile many barriers to the adoption of electronic health records do exist, concerns about disruption to the patient-psychiatrist relationship need not be a prominent focus. Attention to communication style, interpersonal manner, and computer proficiency may help maintain the quality of the patient-psychiatrist relationship following EHR implementation.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAmbulatory CareAttitude to ComputersCommunicationComputer SecurityConfidentialityElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInternetMaleMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID20064210
PMCPMC2818653
OpenAlexW2102544471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.