ArticlePloS one2010
Identification of retinal transformation hot spots in developing Drosophila epithelia.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulating the levels and activity of the retinal determination network is sufficient to induce the specification of distinct tissue fates in Drosophila.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Differential regulation of eye specification in Drosophila by Polycomb Group epigenetic repressors.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Human ERG oncoprotein repressesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- The timing of cell fate decisions is crucial for initiating pattern formation in the Drosophila eye.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- A genetic screen in Drosophila uncovers the multifaceted properties of the NUP98-HOXA9 oncogene.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Eyeless/Pax6 initiates eye formation non-autonomously from the peripodial epithelium.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
- Polycomb group (PcG) proteins and Pax6 cooperate to inhibitDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Master regulators in development: Views from the Drosophila retinal determination and mammalian pluripotency gene networks.Developmental biology · 2017Review
- The morphogen Decapentaplegic employs a two-tier mechanism to activate target retinal determining genes during ectopic eye formation in Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Eye selector logic for a coordinated cell cycle exit.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Posterior eyespots in larval chitons have a molecular identity similar to anterior cerebral eyes in other bilaterians.EvoDevo · 2015Article
- Article
- Dynamic rewiring of the Drosophila retinal determination network switches its function from selector to differentiation.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Competition among gene regulatory networks imposes order within the eye-antennal disc of Drosophila.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2013Article
- Nemo phosphorylates Eyes absent and enhances output from the Eya-Sine oculis transcriptional complex during Drosophila retinal determination.Developmental biology · 2012Article
- Dual transcriptional activities of SIX proteins define their roles in normal and ectopic eye development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2012Article
- MAPK target sites of eyes absent are not required for eye development or survival in Drosophila.PloS one · 2012Article
- My what big eyes you have: how the Drosophila retina grows.Developmental neurobiology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe retinal determination (RD) network is an evolutionarily conserved regulatory circuit that governs early events in the development of eyes throughout the animal kingdom. Ectopic expression of many members of this network leads to the transformation of non-retinal epithelia into eye tissue. An often-overlooked observation is that only particular cell-populations within a handful of tissues are capable of having their primary developmental instructions superseded and overruled. METHODOLOGY/PRELIMINARY
findingsHere we confirm that indeed, only a discrete number of cell populations within the imaginal discs that give rise to the head, antenna, legs, wings and halteres have the cellular plasticity to have their developmental fates altered. In contrast to previous reports, we find that all transformable cell populations do not lie within the TGFbeta or Hedgehog signaling domains. Additionally neither signaling cascade alone is sufficient for non-retinal cell types to be converted into retinal tissue. The transformation "hot spots" that we have identified appear to coincide with several previously defined transdetermination "weak spots", suggesting that ectopic eye formation is less the result of one network overriding the orders of another, as previously thought, but rather is the physical manifestation of redirecting cell populations of enormous cellular plasticity. We also demonstrate that the initiation of eye formation in non-retinal tissues occurs asynchronously compared to that of the normal eye suggesting that retinal development is not under the control of a global developmental clock. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that the subregions of non-retinal tissues that are capable of supporting eye formation represent specialized cell-populations that have a different level of plasticity than other cells within these tissues and may be the founder cells of each tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.