Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20062581›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2009

Yeasts in the gut: from commensals to infectious agents.

Jürgen Schulze, Ulrich Sonnenborn

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Commensal colonization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Shared metabolism between a bacterial and fungal species that reside in the human gut.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Early-Onset Candidemia in Adult Intensive Care Units.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dectin-1 as a therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel disease.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jürgen SchulzeJuR.Schulze@t-online.de
Ulrich Sonnenborn
Lifeline Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy still surrounds the question whether yeasts found in the gut are causally related to disease, constitute a health hazard, or require treatment.

methodsThe authors present the state of knowledge in this area on the basis of a selective review of articles retrieved by a PubMed search from 2005 onward. The therapeutic recommendations follow the current national and international guidelines.

resultsYeasts, mainly Candida species, are present in the gut of about 70% of healthy adults. Mucocutaneous Candida infections are due either to impaired host defenses or to altered gene expression in formerly commensal strains. The expression of virulence factors enables yeasts to form biofilms, destroy tissues, and escape the immunological attacks of the host. Yeast infections of the intestinal mucosa are of uncertain clinical significance, and their possible connection to irritable bowel syndrome, while plausible, remains unproved. Yeast colonization can trigger allergic reactions. Mucosal yeast infections are treated with topically active polyene antimycotic drugs. The adjuvant administration of probiotics is justified on the basis of positive results from controlled clinical trials.

conclusionThe eradication of intestinal yeasts is advised only for certain clearly defined indications.

Indexed as

CandidaCandidiasisEnterocolitisHumansIncidenceIntestinesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscandidiasisgastrointestinal mycosispathogenesistreatmentyeast infection

Identifiers

PMID20062581
PMCPMC2803610
OpenAlexW2121442897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.