Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20061960›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2010

Exploring attitudes, beliefs, and communication preferences of Latino community members regarding BRCA1/2 mutation testing and preventive strategies.

Anita Yeomans Kinney, Amanda Gammon, James Coxworth, Sara E Simonsen, Maritza Arce-Laretta

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03959267 (Testing a Culturally Adapted Telephone Genetic Counseling Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03959267 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Testing a Culturally Adapted Telephone Genetic Counseling Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled37ConditionsBreast Cancer, Hereditary Breast CancerArmsTelephone Genetic Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anita Yeomans KinneyHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. anita.kinney@hci.utah.edu
Amanda Gammon
James Coxworth
Sara E Simonsen
Maritza Arce-Laretta

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
BRCA1 TESTING IN A LARGE AFRICAN AMERICAN KINDREDR01HG002241 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KINNEY, ANITA Y · 2000 to 2003
$1.7M
PREVENTIVE ONCOLOGY AWARDK07CA082121 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KINNEY, ANITA Y · 1999 to 2003
$493k
NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA042014NCI NIH HHS KO7 CA82121NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo inform development of a culturally sensitive hereditary breast and ovarian cancer communication initiative and related clinical genetic services.

methodsFive focus groups were conducted with 51 female and male Latinos. Educational materials were designed to communicate information about hereditary breast or ovarian cancer and availability of relevant clinical services or prevention strategies. Focus groups explored participants' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, BRCA1/2 testing, and communication preferences for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer health messages.

resultsOverall, awareness of familial breast and ovarian cancer and availability of genetic risk assessment was low. Once informed, participants held favorable attitudes toward risk assessment and counseling services. Critical themes of the research highlighted the need to provide bilingual media products and use of a variety of strategies to increase awareness about hereditary cancer risk and availability of clinical genetic services. Important barriers were identified regarding family cancer history communication and cancer prevention services. Strategies were suggested for communicating cancer genetic information to increase awareness and overcome these barriers; these included both targeted and tailored approaches.

conclusionThis research suggests that cancer genetic communication efforts should consider community and cultural perspectives as well as health care access issues before widespread implementation.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersGenes, BRCA1Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCultureFemaleGenetic CounselingHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationOvarian NeoplasmsResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID20061960
PMCPMC3022322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.