Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20061580›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2010

AT_CHLORO, a comprehensive chloroplast proteome database with subplastidial localization and curated information on envelope proteins.

Myriam Ferro, Sabine Brugière, Daniel Salvi, Daphné Seigneurin-Berny, Magali Court, Lucas Moyet, Claire Ramus, Stéphane Miras, Mourad Mellal, Sophie Le Gall and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 224 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
224citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

224 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 469 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

164 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Myriam FerroINSERM, Laboratoire d'Etude de Dynamique des Protéomes, U880, France.
Sabine Brugière
Daniel Salvi
Daphné Seigneurin-Berny
Magali Court
Lucas Moyet
Claire Ramus
Stéphane Miras
Mourad Mellal
Sophie Le Gall
Sylvie Kieffer-Jaquinod
Christophe Bruley
Jérôme Garin
Jacques Joyard
Christophe Masselon
Norbert Rolland
CEA Grenoble · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Recherches en Technologies et Sciences pour le Vivant · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRLaboratoire Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale · FRUniversité Joseph Fourier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in the proteomics field have allowed a series of high throughput experiments to be conducted on chloroplast samples, and the data are available in several public databases. However, the accurate localization of many chloroplast proteins often remains hypothetical. This is especially true for envelope proteins. We went a step further into the knowledge of the chloroplast proteome by focusing, in the same set of experiments, on the localization of proteins in the stroma, the thylakoids, and envelope membranes. LC-MS/MS-based analyses first allowed building the AT_CHLORO database (http://www.grenoble.prabi.fr/protehome/grenoble-plant-proteomics/), a comprehensive repertoire of the 1323 proteins, identified by 10,654 unique peptide sequences, present in highly purified chloroplasts and their subfractions prepared from Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. This database also provides extensive proteomics information (peptide sequences and molecular weight, chromatographic retention times, MS/MS spectra, and spectral count) for a unique chloroplast protein accurate mass and time tag database gathering identified peptides with their respective and precise analytical coordinates, molecular weight, and retention time. We assessed the partitioning of each protein in the three chloroplast compartments by using a semiquantitative proteomics approach (spectral count). These data together with an in-depth investigation of the literature were compiled to provide accurate subplastidial localization of previously known and newly identified proteins. A unique knowledge base containing extensive information on the proteins identified in envelope fractions was thus obtained, allowing new insights into this membrane system to be revealed. Altogether, the data we obtained provide unexpected information about plastidial or subplastidial localization of some proteins that were not suspected to be associated to this membrane system. The spectral counting-based strategy was further validated as the compartmentation of well known pathways (for instance, photosynthesis and amino acid, fatty acid, or glycerolipid biosynthesis) within chloroplasts could be dissected. It also allowed revisiting the compartmentation of the chloroplast metabolism and functions.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBlotting, WesternCell CompartmentationCell FractionationChloroplastsIntracellular MembranesMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteomeProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSubcellular FractionsThylakoidsArabidopsis ProteinsPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID20061580
PMCPMC2877971
OpenAlexW2081204547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.