Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20060707›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2010

Mechanisms of ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding.

Gregory D Bowman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physical modeling of nucleosome clustering in euchromatin resulting from interactions between epigenetic reader proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fun30 nucleosome remodeller regulates white-to-opaque switching inActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023
    Article
  9. The Chromatin Remodeling FactorPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gregory D BowmanT C Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218-2685, USA. gdbowman@jhu.edu

Funding

Structural and Functional Characterization of the Chd1 Chromatin RemodelerR01GM084192 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOWMAN, GREGORY DEAN · 2008 to 2024
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084129NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin remodelers are multifunctional protein machines that use a conserved ATPase motor to slide nucleosomes along DNA. Nucleosome sliding has been proposed to occur through two mechanisms: twist diffusion and loop/bulge propagation. A central idea for both of these models is that a DNA distortion propagates over the surface of the nucleosome. Recent data from biochemical and single-molecule experiments have expanded our understanding of histone-DNA and remodeler-nucleosome interactions, and called into question some of the basic assumptions on which these models were originally based. Advantages and challenges of several nucleosome sliding models are discussed.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateDNAHistonesNucleosomesAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateDNAHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID20060707
PMCPMC2947954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.