Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20060600›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2010

Early transformations in odor representation.

Thomas A Cleland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tolerance to future elevated COJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A physicochemical model of odor sampling.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A Systematic Framework for Olfactory Bulb Signal Transformations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. History-Dependent Odor Processing in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  19. Stimulation of the Locus Ceruleus Modulates Signal-to-Noise Ratio in the Olfactory Bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas A ClelandDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. tac29@cornell.edu

Funding

CRCNS: Cholinergic regulation of sensory computationR01DC009948 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
Computational mechanisms in the olfactory bulbR03DC007725 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A · 2006 to 2008
$233k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009948NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC007725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory representations are repeatedly transformed by neural computations that determine which of their attributes can be effectively processed at each stage. Whereas some early computations are common across multiple sensory systems, they can utilize dissimilar underlying mechanisms depending on the properties of each modality. Recent work in the olfactory bulb has substantially clarified the neural algorithms underlying early odor processing. The high-dimensionality of odor space strictly limits the utility of topographical representations, forcing similarity-dependent computations such as decorrelation to employ unusual neural algorithms. The distinct architectures and properties of the two prominent computational layers in the olfactory bulb suggest that the bulb is directly comparable not only to the retina but also to primary visual cortex.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansNerve NetOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysSensory Receptor CellsSmellSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID20060600
PMCPMC2839009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.