Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20060491›Full record

ReviewMutation research

Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization.

S V Costes, I Chiolo, J M Pluth, M H Barcellos-Hoff, B Jakob

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2022
    Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S V CostesLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. svcostes@lbl.gov
I Chiolo
J M Pluth
M H Barcellos-Hoff
B Jakob
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USGSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research · DENew York University · US

Funding

Regulation of DNA Damage and Repair in HeterochromatinR01GM086613 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI KARPEN, GARY H · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Dynamics of heterochromatin DNA repair: novel role of nuclear architectureR21ES021541 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHIOLO, IRENE E · 2013 to 2014
$449k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES021541NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage sensing proteins have been shown to localize to the sites of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) within seconds to minutes following ionizing radiation (IR) exposure, resulting in the formation of microscopically visible nuclear domains referred to as radiation-induced foci (RIF). This review characterizes the spatiotemporal properties of RIF at physiological doses, minutes to hours following exposure to ionizing radiation, and it proposes a model describing RIF formation and resolution as a function of radiation quality and chromatin territories. Discussion is limited to RIF formed by three interrelated proteins ATM (Ataxia telangiectasia mutated), 53BP1 (p53 binding protein 1) and gammaH2AX (phosphorylated variant histone H2AX), with an emphasis on the later. This review discusses the importance of not equating RIF with DSB in all situations and shows how dose and time dependence of RIF frequency is inconsistent with a one to one equivalence. Instead, we propose that RIF mark regions of the chromatin that would serve as scaffolds rigid enough to keep broken DNA from diffusing away, but open enough to allow the repair machinery to access the damage site. We review data indicating clear kinetic and physical differences between RIF emerging from dense and uncondensed regions of the nucleus. We suggest that persistent RIF observed days following exposure to ionizing radiation are nuclear marks of permanent rearrangement of the chromatin architecture. Such chromatin alterations may not always lead to growth arrest as cells have been shown to replicate these in progeny. Thus, heritable persistent RIF spanning over tens of Mbp may reflect persistent changes in the transcriptome of a large progeny of cells. Such model opens the door to a "non-DNA-centric view" of radiation-induced phenotypes.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHistonesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsModels, TheoreticalProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Tumor Suppressor ProteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsH2AX protein, humanHistonesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20060491
PMCPMC3951968
OpenAlexW1998869208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.