Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20059334›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of medicine2010

HIV-1 vaccine development after STEP.

Dan H Barouch, Bette Korber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. T cell-based strategies for HIV-1 vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan H BarouchDivision of Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. dbarouch@bidmc.harvard.edu
Bette Korber

Funding

Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
Preclinical Evaluation of Novel Adenovirus Prime-Boost HIV-1 VaccineU19AI078526 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DOLIN, RAPHAEL · 2008 to 2012
$44.0M
Preclinical Evaluation of Novel Adenovirus VectorsU19AI066305 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2005 to 2009
$19.8M
Viral and Host Determinants of HIV-1 TransmissionU01AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F · 2005 to 2005
$14.9M
Neutralizing Antibody Induction by Centralized GenesP01AI061734 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F. · 2005 to 2009
$11.7M
Impact of HIV Envelope Conformation on ImmunogenicityR01AI084794 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H., CHEN, BING · 2009 to 2013
$4.0M
Novel Adenovirus Vaccine Vectors for HIV/SIVR01AI066924 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2006 to 2010
$3.5M
Augmentation of DNA Vaccine-Elicited Immunity to HIV/SIVR01AI058727 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2004 to 2008
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI058727NIAID NIH HHS AI061734NIAID NIH HHS AI066305NIAID NIH HHS AI066924NIAID NIH HHS AI067854NIAID NIH HHS AI078526NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI061734NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058727NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066924NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI084794NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI066305NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI078526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite more than 25 years of concerted worldwide research, the development of a safe and effective HIV-1 vaccine remains elusive. Prototype antibody-based and T cell-based HIV-1 vaccines have failed to show efficacy in clinical trials to date. Next-generation HIV-1 vaccine candidates are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development, but key scientific obstacles pose major challenges for the field. Critical hurdles include the enormous global diversity of the virus and the challenges associated with generating broadly reactive neutralizing antibody and cellular immune responses. We review the current state of the HIV-1 vaccine field and outline strategies that are being explored to overcome these roadblocks.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralImmunologic FactorsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHIV-1HIV InfectionsHLA AntigensHumansImmunity, CellularAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA AntigensImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID20059334
PMCPMC2819364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.