Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20058015›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2010

Is rheumatoid factor still a superior test for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?

Usha Singh, Anjali Vishwanath, Pramod K Verma, Nand K Singh, Ram C Shukla, Sangeeta Singh, Suman Singh, Gyanendra K Sonkar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RF vs. anti-CCP: competitor or companion?Rheumatology international · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Usha SinghDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India.
Anjali Vishwanath
Pramod K Verma
Nand K Singh
Ram C Shukla
Sangeeta Singh
Suman Singh
Gyanendra K Sonkar
Banaras Hindu University · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based primarily on the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA, which considers mainly the clinical symptoms. But typical clinical symptoms of RA are not manifested completely in early disease course. On the other hand, appreciable advantages have been made in the therapeutic strategy of RA in the last decade and highly effective disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are available now for the control of RA. The treatment strategy for the control of early RA is aggressive. Thus, a highly specific and early diagnostic marker is needed for the detection of RA. Our study is an attempt to see the role of anti-CCP2 antibody (claimed to be highly specific and early diagnostic tool) in the diagnosis of RA. We studied 119 cases of RA in terms of clinical symptoms, disease duration and various autoantibody [including rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-CCP2 antibody, antinuclear antibody, anti-dsDNA] and C-reactive protein status. All the tests were also performed in 26 age and sex-matched healthy controls. Estimation of antibodies was done by quantitative ELISA. IgM RF was positive in 47.89% cases (p value = 0.000), followed by IgG RF (42.01%, p = 0.000) and IgA RF (36.97%, p = 0.000). RF was positive in 64.7% RA cases (p value = 0.000) when all three isotypes were tested together. RF was also detected in one healthy control. In 92 cases, anti-CCP2 Ab was done, hence other data were analyzed further in 92 cases only. Anti-CCP2 Ab was positive (cut-off = 15.0 U/ml) in only 50% RA patients but none of the healthy controls was positive for it. Swelling of joints was seen in 82.6% anti-CCP2 Ab positive cases (p value = 0.092) when compared with anti-CCP2 Ab negative cases (67.4%) while among RF positive cases, only 65.4% ((p value = 0.010) cases had swelling of joints. Out of 39 RA cases presenting with disease duration less than 1 year, only 48.71% patients were anti-CCP2 Ab positive while RF was positive in 61.53% patients. Utility of various combined autoantibody tests revealed that if one does all isotypes of RF (IgG, IgA and IgM) only, then 64.7% RA cases can be diagnosed and if anti-CCP2 Ab is added to it, the sensitivity increases to 75.56%. Thus, our study concludes that anti-CCP2 Ab is not a sensitive test for the diagnosis of RA neither it is useful in early diagnosis of RA, but it increases the sensitivity if added with all RF isotypes.

Indexed as

AdultArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersEarly DiagnosisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRheumatoid FactorBiomarkersRheumatoid Factor

Identifiers

PMID20058015
OpenAlexW2025371553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.