ArticleStroke2010
Assessment and improvement of figures to visually convey benefit and risk of stroke thrombolysis.
Article in Stroke, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Authorized surrogate presence and its association with early in-hospital delays and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Thrombolytic Refusal Over Telestroke.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Decision-Making Visual Aids for Late, Imaging-Guided Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of stroke · 2020Article
- Article
- Uncovering the Rosetta Stone: Report from the First Annual Conference on Key Elements in Translating Stroke Therapeutics from Pre-Clinical to Clinical.Translational stroke research · 2018Article
- Racial disparities in refusal of stroke thrombolysis in Chicago.Neurology · 2018Article
- Generalization of the Right Acute Stroke Prevention Strategies in Reducing in-Hospital Delays.PloS one · 2016Article
- Inability to consent does not diminish the desirability of stroke thrombolysis.Annals of neurology · 2014Article
- Evaluation and management of acute ischemic stroke.Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) · 2014Review
- A review of decision support, risk communication and patient information tools for thrombolytic treatment in acute stroke: lessons for tool developers.BMC health services research · 2013Review
- Optimal end points for acute stroke therapy trials: best ways to measure treatment effects of drugs and devices.Stroke · 2011Review
- Safety of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a review of complications, risk factors, and newer technologies.The Neurohospitalist · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeDeciding whether to use intravenous fibrinolytic therapy for acute cerebral ischemia within 3 hours of onset is challenging for patients, family members, and health care providers. Visual displays can permit individuals to rapidly understand response patterns to therapy. This study sought to evaluate, refine, and improve existing visual aids for stroke fibrinolytic decision-making.
methodsExisting visual aids were identified by Medline search and querying of national guideline organizations, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and stroke specialists, and were rated on a formal 8-point quality rating scale (0, lowest; 8, highest). Based on available instruments, new visual displays were developed to improve informed decision-making in routine practice.
resultsTwo existing visual aids were identified, one from an emergency medicine society and one from a pharmaceutical company. Both were comparison visual displays of outcomes with and without treatment; no decision matrix visual aid was found. Both scored 4.0 on the quality scale, showing defects of effect size distortion, privileging less salient outcomes, dissimilar representation by treatment group, and limited stakeholder participation in generation. Revised versions of these graphics were developed with higher quality scores (6.75 and 7.75). In addition, a new decision matrix display with quality score 8.0 was developed that complements the numeric text of a national patient education tool developed jointly by US neurology, emergency medicine, and stroke patient organizations.
conclusionsExisting visual aids for stroke fibrinolysis decision-making have deficiencies. New visual displays are now available to convey the health benefits and risks of fibrinolytic stroke therapy efficiently and informatively to patients and family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.