Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20056928›Full record

ArticleStroke2010

Assessment and improvement of figures to visually convey benefit and risk of stroke thrombolysis.

Jigneshkumar Gadhia, Sidney Starkman, Bruce Ovbiagele, Latisha Ali, David Liebeskind, Jeffrey L Saver

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Thrombolytic Refusal Over Telestroke.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation and management of acute ischemic stroke.Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jigneshkumar GadhiaStroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif 90095, USA.
Sidney Starkman
Bruce Ovbiagele
Latisha Ali
David Liebeskind
Jeffrey L Saver
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium Trial (FAST-MAG)U01NS044364 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SAVER, JEFFREY L · 2003 to 2013
$46.4M
UCLA SPOTRIAS CENTER APPLICATION RENEWAL-PROGRAM PROJECTP50NS044378 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SAVER, JEFFREY L · 2003 to 2012
$17.2M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS044378NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS044364NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS 44364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDeciding whether to use intravenous fibrinolytic therapy for acute cerebral ischemia within 3 hours of onset is challenging for patients, family members, and health care providers. Visual displays can permit individuals to rapidly understand response patterns to therapy. This study sought to evaluate, refine, and improve existing visual aids for stroke fibrinolytic decision-making.

methodsExisting visual aids were identified by Medline search and querying of national guideline organizations, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and stroke specialists, and were rated on a formal 8-point quality rating scale (0, lowest; 8, highest). Based on available instruments, new visual displays were developed to improve informed decision-making in routine practice.

resultsTwo existing visual aids were identified, one from an emergency medicine society and one from a pharmaceutical company. Both were comparison visual displays of outcomes with and without treatment; no decision matrix visual aid was found. Both scored 4.0 on the quality scale, showing defects of effect size distortion, privileging less salient outcomes, dissimilar representation by treatment group, and limited stakeholder participation in generation. Revised versions of these graphics were developed with higher quality scores (6.75 and 7.75). In addition, a new decision matrix display with quality score 8.0 was developed that complements the numeric text of a national patient education tool developed jointly by US neurology, emergency medicine, and stroke patient organizations.

conclusionsExisting visual aids for stroke fibrinolysis decision-making have deficiencies. New visual displays are now available to convey the health benefits and risks of fibrinolytic stroke therapy efficiently and informatively to patients and family members.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAudiovisual AidsCaregiversComputer GraphicsData Interpretation, StatisticalEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansIntracranial ThrombosisOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicRisk AssessmentSoftware DesignStrokeThrombolytic Therapy

Identifiers

PMID20056928
PMCPMC2909659
OpenAlexW2152520395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.