Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20056666›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2010

Career destinations, views and future plans of the UK medical qualifiers of 1988.

Kathryn Taylor, Trevor Lambert, Michael Goldacre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How does it feel to work as a doctor in the NHS?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathryn TaylorUK Medical Careers Research Group, Department of Public Health, Oxford University Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.
Trevor Lambert
Michael Goldacre

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report the career destinations, views and future plans of a cohort of senior doctors who qualified in the 1980s.

methodsPostal questionnaire survey of all doctors who qualified from all UK medical schools in 1988.

resultsThe response rate was 69%. We estimated that 81% of the total cohort was working in the NHS, 16 years after qualification; and that at least 94% of graduates who, when students, were from UK homes, were working in medicine. Of NHS doctors, 30% worked part-time. NHS doctors rated their job satisfaction highly (median score 19.9, scale 5-25) but were less satisfied with the amount of leisure time available to them (median score 5.4, scale 1-10). NHS doctors were very positive about their careers, but were less positive about working hours and some other aspects of the NHS. Women were more positive than men about working conditions; general practitioners were more positive than hospital doctors. Twenty-five percent reported unmet needs for further training or career-related advice, particularly about career development. Twenty-nine percent intended to reduce their hours in future, while 6%, mainly part-time women, planned to increase their hours. Overall, 10% of NHS doctors planned to do more service work in future and 24% planned to do less; among part-time women, 18% planned to do more and only 14% less.

conclusionsThese NHS doctors, now in their 40s, had a high level of satisfaction with their jobs and their careers but were less satisfied with some other aspects of their working environment. A substantial percentage had expectations about future career development and change.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceJob SatisfactionAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalCohort StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWorkload

Identifiers

PMID20056666
PMCPMC2802712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.