Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20056664›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2010

Why tomorrow's doctors need primary care today.

David J Pearson, Robert K McKinley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exposure of undergraduates to authentic GP teaching and subsequent entry to GP training: a quantitative study of UK medical schools.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  4. Undergraduate teaching in UK general practice: a geographical snapshot.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David J PearsonAcademic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9JL, UK. d.j.pearson@leeds.ac.uk
Robert K McKinley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CurriculumDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPrimary Health CareProfessional CompetenceQuality Assurance, Health CareSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID20056664
PMCPMC2802707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.