Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20056177›Full record

ArticleBone2010

Higher BMC and areal BMD in children and grandchildren of individuals with hip or knee replacement.

Bonny L Specker, Howard E Wey, Teresa L Binkley, Tianna M Beare, Eric P Smith, Frank Rauch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bonny L SpeckerEA Martin Program, South Dakota State University, SWC Box 506, SDSU, Brookings, SD 57007, USA. bonny.specker@sdstate.edu
Howard E Wey
Teresa L Binkley
Tianna M Beare
Eric P Smith
Frank Rauch
South Dakota State University · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Erie · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

Bone Density And Later Bone Loss In Rural PopulationsR01AR047852 · NIAMS · SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPECKER, BONNY L · 2001 to 2005
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047852NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR47852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between aBMD and osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear. We compared aBMD, BMC and bone size among children and grandchildren of Hutterites with hip or knee replacement (n=23 each) to children and grandchildren of age- and sex-matched controls (178 children and 267 grandchildren). There were no differences in anthropometric measures or activity levels between case and control probands, but femoral neck (FN) and spine (LS) aBMD and Z-scores were greater in cases than controls (0.89 vs. 0.80 g/cm2; 1.15 vs. 1.03 g/cm2; 1.5 vs. 0.8; 2.4 vs. 1.2: all p<0.05). Hip, FN and LS aBMD (1.05 vs. 0.97, 0.92 vs. 0.84, 1.15 vs. 1.03 g/cm2), BMC (34.1 vs. 32.0, 4.58 vs. 4.27, 69.5 vs. 62.4 g) and Z-scores (1.0 vs. 0.4; 0.9 vs. 0.2; 1.3 vs. 0.2) were greater in daughters of cases than controls (hip BMC p=0.06, others p<0.05); there were no differences between sons. Grandchildren (aged 8-39 years) were categorized as growing (premenarcheal or male<14 years) or not growing (> or =2 years post-menarcheal or males> or =18 years): 33 were not classified. Post-menarcheal, but not premenarcheal, granddaughters of cases had greater hip, FN and LS aBMD Z-scores (0.7 vs. -0.1; 0.6 vs. -0.1; 0.8 vs. -0.3); greater hip and spine aBMD (1.03 vs. 0.95, 1.10 vs. 0.98 g/cm2); greater femoral neck and spine BMC (4.77 vs. 4.21, 66.7 vs. 55.4 g); and greater spine bone area (60.7 vs. 56.6 cm2) compared to granddaughters of controls (all, p<0.05), which remained significant when height, weight, and age were included as covariates. Growing grandsons of cases were taller and heavier than control grandsons, and a greater hip aBMD among grandsons of cases (0.88 vs. 0.76 g/cm2) was the only bone difference that remained significant after taking into account body size differences. Grandsons who were not growing had greater spine bone area (1.19 vs. 1.08 cm2) if their grandparent had OA compared to grandsons whose grandparents did not have OA. We speculate that there is a genetic basis for OA that leads to early differences in growth patterns among boys and greater peak bone mass and aBMD among girls.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFamilyAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnthropometryBone DensityChildChi-Square DistributionFemaleFemur NeckHumansMaleMiddle Agedestrogengeneticsgrowthosteoarthritispediatrics

Identifiers

PMID20056177
PMCPMC2842471
OpenAlexW2058484605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.