Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20055994›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Evaluation of fecal mRNA reproducibility via a marginal transformed mixture modeling approach.

Nysia I George, Joanne R Lupton, Nancy D Turner, Robert S Chapkin, Laurie A Davidson, Naisyin Wang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nysia I GeorgeDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1107, USA.
Joanne R Lupton
Nancy D Turner
Robert S Chapkin
Laurie A Davidson
Naisyin Wang

Funding

Colonic Cytokinetics and Cell Signaling: Dietary EffectsR01CA059034 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI CHAPKIN, ROBERT STEPHEN · 1995 to 2012
$3.6M
Measurement Error, Missing Data and SemiparametricsR01CA074552 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WANG, NAISYIN · 2002 to 2015
$2.2M
Gene expression analysis of coding and non-coding RNAs in colon cancer preventionR01CA129444 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI CHAPKIN, ROBERT STEPHEN · 2007 to 2015
$2.1M
MISSING/MISMEASURED VARIABLES--METHODS AND APPLICATIONSR29CA074552 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI WANG, NAISYIN · 1997 to 2001
$203k
NCI NIH HHS CA129444NCI NIH HHS CA59034NCI NIH HHS CA74552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping and evaluating new technology that enables researchers to recover gene-expression levels of colonic cells from fecal samples could be key to a non-invasive screening tool for early detection of colon cancer. The current study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to investigate and report the reproducibility of fecal microarray data. Using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as a measure of reproducibility and the preliminary analysis of fecal and mucosal data, we assessed the reliability of mixture density estimation and the reproducibility of fecal microarray data. Using Monte Carlo-based methods, we explored whether ICC values should be modeled as a beta-mixture or transformed first and fitted with a normal-mixture. We used outcomes from bootstrapped goodness-of-fit tests to determine which approach is less sensitive toward potential violation of distributional assumptions.

resultsThe graphical examination of both the distributions of ICC and probit-transformed ICC (PT-ICC) clearly shows that there are two components in the distributions. For ICC measurements, which are between 0 and 1, the practice in literature has been to assume that the data points are from a beta-mixture distribution. Nevertheless, in our study we show that the use of a normal-mixture modeling approach on PT-ICC could provide superior performance.

conclusionsWhen modeling ICC values of gene expression levels, using mixture of normals in the probit-transformed (PT) scale is less sensitive toward model mis-specification than using mixture of betas. We show that a biased conclusion could be made if we follow the traditional approach and model the two sets of ICC values using the mixture of betas directly. The problematic estimation arises from the sensitivity of beta-mixtures toward model mis-specification, particularly when there are observations in the neighborhood of the the boundary points, 0 or 1. Since beta-mixture modeling is commonly used in approximating the distribution of measurements between 0 and 1, our findings have important implications beyond the findings of the current study. By using the normal-mixture approach on PT-ICC, we observed the quality of reproducible genes in fecal array data to be comparable to those in mucosal arrays.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticFecesGene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID20055994
PMCPMC2827371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.