Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2010
Diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy: extension of the initial human trial for staging of pancreatic head masses.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flexible transgastric endoscopic liver cyst fenestration: A feasibility study in humans (with video).Medicine · 2016Trial
- Oral chlorhexidine and microbial contamination during endoscopy: possible implications for transgastric surgery. A randomized, clinical trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Trial
- Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: history and current development.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Endoscopic suturing is superior to endoclips for closure of gastrotomy after natural orifices translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an ex vivo study.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Article
- Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery technique.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Article
- Deep sedation in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a comparative study with dogs.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- No-incision (NOTES) versus single-incision (single-port) surgery for access to sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a back-to-back animal study.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- Real-time computed tomography-based augmented reality for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery navigation.The British journal of surgery · 2012Article
- Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with ultrasonography-guided transgastric access and over-the-scope-clip closure: a porcine feasibility and survival study.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- Transgastric pure-NOTES peritoneoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of gastrointestinal cancers: a survival and feasibility study.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Article
- Update on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2012Article
- Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery applications in clinical practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2012Article
- Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery in humans: a review.Minimally invasive surgery · 2012Article
- Critical analysis of hot topics in NOTES.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2011Review
- The Second SAGES/ASGE White Paper on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: 5 years of progress.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not lead to increased risk of infectious complications.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
- Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Review
- A review of 130 humans enrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Review
- Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in pancreatic diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2010Review
- [Transesophageal/transgastric access for NOTES].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe validity of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) was confirmed in a human trial of 10 patients undergoing diagnostic transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (DTEP) for staging of pancreatic head masses. This report is an update with 10 additional patients in the series and includes bacterial contamination data.
methodsThe patients in this human trial were scheduled to undergo diagnostic laparoscopy for abdominal staging of a pancreatic head mass. A second surgeon, blinded to the laparoscopic findings, performed a transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy (TEP). The findings of laparoscopic exploration were compared with that those of the TEP. Diagnostic findings, operative times, and clinical course were recorded. Bacterial contamination data were collected for the second cohort of 10 patients. Bacterial samples were collected from the scope before use and the abdominal cavity before and after creation of the gastrotomy. Samples were assessed for bacterial counts and species identification. Definitive care was rendered based on the findings from laparoscopy.
resultsIn this study, 20 patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy followed by DTEP. The average time for completion of diagnostic laparoscopy was 10 min compared with 21 min for TEP. The experience acquired during the initial 10 procedures translated to a 7-min decrease in TEP time for the second 10 cases. For 19 of the 20 patients, DTEP corroborated laparoscopic findings for surgical decision making. One endoscopic and five laparoscopic biopsies were performed. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed for 14 patients and palliative gastrojejunostomy for 6 patients. No cross-contamination of the peritoneum or infectious complications were noted. No significant complications related to either the endoscopic or laparoscopic approach occurred.
conclusionsThis study supports the authors' previous conclusions that the transgastric approach to diagnostic peritoneoscopy is feasible, safe, and accurate. The lack of documented bacterial contamination further supports the use of this technique. Technical issues, including intraabdominal manipulation and gastric closure, require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.