Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2010
Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive analysis of robotic assisted vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using propensity score matching.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- A comparative analysis and survival analysis of open versus minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided pancreatic cancer: A systemic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Pooled it
- Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2013Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2012Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Trial
- Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive distal pancreatosplenectomy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.Cancers · 2025Article
- Nationwide cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic radical pancreatosplenectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- Minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: routine vs. modified.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2022Review
- A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's robotic experience in a high-volume center.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: preliminary experience with 10 cases.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2019Review
- Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith increasing laparoscopic experience, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy is being regarded as a safe and effective treatment for benign and borderline malignant lesions of the pancreas; however, its application for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still debatable.
methodsWe analyzed patients who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) for distal pancreatic cancer at our institution. We have performed laparoscopic DPS partly based on radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for well-selected left-sided PDAC since 2007. We compared laparoscopic DPS to conventional DPS according to various clinicopathologic factors.
resultsFrom January 1999 to December 2008, 45 patients underwent conventional DPS for resectable left-sided PDAC, and 18 needed combined adjacent organ resection for potential margin negative (R0) resection. The median survival of resected left-sided PDAC was 27.9 months with a 5-year survival of 28.9%. A small amount of intraoperative bleeding [< or =760 ml Exp(beta) = 6.312, p = 0.001] and R0 resection [Exp(beta) = 4.349, p = 0.090] were the most significant prognostic factors. To achieve bloodless and R0 resection, the potential indication for laparoscopic DPS was suspicious pancreatic cancer confined to the pancreas that could be removed by DPS without resection of the adjacent organs. Five patients underwent laparoscopic/robot-assisted DPS for left-sided PDAC. Compared to conventional DPS, only the operation time (p = 0.011) and tumor size (p = 0.031) were significantly different, but other clinicopathologic variables were comparable. All patients still are alive. Four patients have lived without tumor recurrence (follow-up = 4-22 months), and only one experienced multiple liver metastasis and subsequent retroperitoneal local recurrence.
conclusionLaparoscopic/robot-assisted modified anterior RAMPS may be technically feasible for well-selected PDAC. The oncologic feasibility still remains to be determined due to limited experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.