ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2009
Cell culture on MEMS platforms: a review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects and Trends in Biomedical Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Devices: A Review.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Advancing Cryo-EM and Cryo-ET through Innovation in Sample Carriers: A Perspective.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Organs on chips: fundamentals, bioengineering and applications.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
- Customizable Collagen Vitrigel Membranes and Preliminary Results in Corneal Engineering.Polymers · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Cardiac Tissue Engineering for the Management of Myocardium Infarction.Cells · 2021Review
- Proliferation and Cluster Analysis of Neurons and Glial Cell Organization on Nanocolumnar TiN Sub-Strates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- PDMS Nano-Modified Scaffolds for Improvement of Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation in Microfluidic Platform.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Cell Culture Platforms with Controllable Stiffness for Chick Embryonic Cardiomyocytes.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Gas Partial Pressure in Cultured Cells: Patho-Physiological Importance and Methodological Approaches.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- A perfusion incubator liver chip for 3D cell culture with application on chronic hepatotoxicity testing.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Multiwell capillarity-based microfluidic device for the study of 3D tumour tissue-2D endothelium interactions and drug screening in co-culture models.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A durable and biocompatible ascorbic acid-based covalent coating method of polydimethylsiloxane for dynamic cell culture.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- Microchip-based 3D-Cell Culture Using Polymer Nanofibers Generated by Solution Blow Spinning.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2017Article
- Microfluidics-based 3D cell culture models: Utility in novel drug discovery and delivery research.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2016Review
- Surface modification on polydimethylsiloxane-based microchannels with fragmented poly(l-lactic acid) nanosheets.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
- Development of a three-dimensional cell culture system based on microfluidics for nuclear magnetic resonance and optical monitoring.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
- Synthetic and bio-artificial tactile sensing: a review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Review
- Manipulating the microvasculature and its microenvironment.Critical reviews in biomedical engineering · 2013Review
- Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) affects gene expression in PC12 cells differentiating into neuronal-like cells.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfabricated systems provide an excellent platform for the culture of cells, and are an extremely useful tool for the investigation of cellular responses to various stimuli. Advantages offered over traditional methods include cost-effectiveness, controllability, low volume, high resolution, and sensitivity. Both biocompatible and bio-incompatible materials have been developed for use in these applications. Biocompatible materials such as PMMA or PLGA can be used directly for cell culture. However, for bio-incompatible materials such as silicon or PDMS, additional steps need to be taken to render these materials more suitable for cell adhesion and maintenance. This review describes multiple surface modification strategies to improve the biocompatibility of MEMS materials. Basic concepts of cell-biomaterial interactions, such as protein adsorption and cell adhesion are covered. Finally, the applications of these MEMS materials in Tissue Engineering are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.